Double anonymity and the peer review process

TheScientificWorldJournal

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages 1274-1277

  Brown, Richard J C ^a  

^a NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Double anonymity; Peer review; Scientific journals

Indexed keywords

PEER REVIEW; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 33750810413     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1537744X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2006.228     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Rowland, F. (2002) Learned Publishing 15, 247.
2. Madden, A.D. (2000) Aslib Proc. 52, 273.
3. Tregenza, T. (2002) Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 349.
4. Broad, W. and Wade, N. (1983) Betrayers of the Truth. Simon & Schuster, New York.
5. Stehbens, W.E. (1999) Med. Hypotheses 52, 31.
6. Maddox, J. (1996) J. NIH Res. 8, 29.
7. Roomans, G.M. (1996) J. NIH Res. 8, 30.
8. Brown, R.J.C. (2005) Qual. Assurance 11, 103.