The common vector approach and its comparison with other subspace methods in case of sufficient data

Computer Speech and Language

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 266-281

  Gülmezoǧlu, M Bilginer ^a   Dzhafarov, Vakif ^b   Edizkan, Rifat ^a   Barkana, Atalay ^b  

^a ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ANADOLU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SET THEORY; SPEECH RECOGNITION; STATE SPACE METHODS;

COMMON VECTOR APPROACH (CVA); LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; TEST SETS; WORD RECOGNITION PROBLEMS;

VECTORS;

EID: 33750740736     PISSN: 08852308     EISSN: 10958363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2006.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barkana, A., Gülmezoǧlu, M.B., Edizkan, R., 1995. Work done in Osmangazi University on speech recognition and building a database. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech Processing. Ankara, Turkey, pp. 37-47.
2. Bishop C.M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. first ed. (1995), Clarendon Press, Oxford
3. Deller J.R., Proakis J.G., and Hansen J.H.L. Discrete-Time Processing of Speech Signals (1993), Macmillan Publishing Company, New York
4. Fukunaga K. Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition (1990), Academic Press, San Diego
5. Gülmezoǧlu, M.B., Barkana, A., 1998. Text-dependent speaker recognition by using Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization method. In: Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications. Canary Islands, Spain, pp. 438-440.
6. Gülmezoǧlu M.B., Dzhafarov V., Keskin M., and Barkana A. A novel approach to isolated word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 7 (1999) 620-628
7. Gülmezoǧlu M.B., Dzhafarov V., and Barkana A. The common vector approach and its relation to the principal component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 9 (2001) 655-662
8. Haeb-Umbach, R., Ney, H., 1992. Linear discriminant analysis for improved large vocabulary continuous speech recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech, Signal Processing, pp. 13-16.
9. Keskin, M., Gülmezoǧlu, M.B., Barkana, A., 1995. Removal of various differences in isolated word recognition by using Gram-Schmidt method. In: Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Signal Processing and Applications. Cappodocia, Turkey, pp. 25-30.
10. Keskin, M., Gülmezoǧlu, M.B., Parlaktuna, O., Barkana, A., 1995. Isolated word recognition by extracting personal differences. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Signal Processing Applications and Technology. Boston, USA, pp. 1989-1992.
11. Kohonen, T., Nemeth, G., Bry, K.-J., Jalanko, M., Riittinen, H., 1979. Spectral classification of phonemes by learning subspaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech, Signal Processing, pp. 97-100.
12. Kohonen, T., Riittinen, H., Jalanko, M., Reuhkala, E., Haltsonen, S., 1980. A thousand-word recognition system based on the learning subspace method and redundant hash addressing. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 158-165.
13. Kohonen T., Riittinen H., Reuhkala E., and Haltsonen S. On-line recognition of spoken words from a large vocabulary. Information Sciences 33 (1984) 3-30
14. Kuhn R., Junqua J.C., Nguyen P., and Niedzielski N. Rapid speaker adaptation in eigenvoice space. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 8 (2000) 695-707
15. Landgrebe D.A. Hyperspectral image data analysis. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 19 (2002) 17-28
16. Lee C., and Landgrebe D.A. Feature extraction based on decision boundaries. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 15 (1993) 388-400
17. Loog, M., Haeb-Umbach, R., 2000. Multi-class linear dimension reduction by generalized Fisher criteria. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pp. 1069-1072.
18. Loog M., Duin R.P.W., and Haeb-Umbach R. Multi-class linear dimension reduction by weighted pairwise Fisher criteria. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 23 (2001) 762-766
19. Marrison D.F. Multivariate Statistical Methods (1967), McGraw Hill, New York
20. Oja E. Subspace Methods of Pattern Recognition (1983), John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York
21. Parsons T.W. Voice and Speech Processing. first ed. (1986), McGraw Hill, New York
22. Rabiner L., and Juang B.-H. Fundamentals of Speech Recognition (1993), Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey
23. Saon, G., Padmanabhan, M., Gopinath, R., Chen, S., 2000. Maximum likelihood discriminant feature spaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech, Signal Processing, pp. 1747-1750.
24. Schukat-Talamazzini, E.G., Hornegger, J., Niemann, H., 1995. Optimal linear feature transformations for semi-continuous hidden Markov models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech, Signal Processing, pp. 369-372.
25. Swets D.L., and Weng J. Using discriminant eigenfeatures for image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 18 (1996) 831-836
26. Tou J.T., and Gonzales R.C. Pattern Recognition Principles. second ed. (1974), Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts
27. Watanabe S., Lambert P.F., Kulikowski C.A., Buxton J.L., and Walker R. Evaluation and selection of variables in pattern recognition. In: Tou J.T. (Ed). Computer and Information Sciences II (1967), Academic Press, New York 91-122
28. Wold S. Pattern recognition by means of disjoint principal component models. Pattern Recognition 8 (1976) 127-139
29. Yang J., Yang J.Y., and Zhang D. What's wrong with Fisher criterion. The Journal of the Pattern Recognition Society 35 (2002) 2665-2668