History and historicism

The Cambridge History of Science: The Modern Social Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 113-130

  Wright, Johnson Kent ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750740435     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521594424.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Ernst Troeltsch, Historismus und seine Probleme(T¨ubingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1922) and “Die Krisis des Historismus,” Die Neue Rundschau, 33 (1922), 572-90.
2. Friedrich Meinecke, Historism: The Rise of a New Historical Outlook, trans. J. E. Anderson and H. D. Schmidt (London: Routledge, 1972), p. 4.
3. Richard Tuck, “The ‘Modern’ Theory of Natural Law,” in The Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe, ed. Anthony Pagden, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 99-119.
4. Istvan Hont, “The Language of Sociability and Commerce: Samuel Pufendorf and the Theoretical Foundations of the ‘Four Stages’ Theory,” pp. 253-76.
5. Ronald L. Meek, Social Science and the Ignoble Savage(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976).
6. Peter Stein, Legal Evolution: The Story of an Idea(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).
7. Adam Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society, ed. Fania Oz-Salzberger (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 119.
8. Maurice Mandelbaum, History, Man, and Reason: A Study inNineteenth-Century Thought(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971), p. 42.
9. Georg G. Iggers, The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present, rev. ed. (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1983), pp. 4-5.
10. Montesquieu R., The Spirit of the Laws, trans. Anne M. Cohler, Basia Carolyn Miller, and Harold Samuel Stone (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 4.
11. Peter Hanns Reill, The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975).
12. Wilhelm von Humboldt, “On the Tasks of the Writer of History,” in his Gesammelte Schriften(Berlin: B. Behr, 1903), vol. 4, pp. 35-6.
13. Leopold von Ranke, Histories of the Latin and Germanic Nations from 1494 to 1535, 2 vols. (Leipzig, 1824), vol. 2, p. 18.
14. Leopold von Ranke, “A Fragment from the 1830s,” in The Varieties of History: From Voltaire to the Present, ed. Fritz Stern (New York: Meridian, 1956), pp. 58-9.
15. Leopold von Ranke, The Theory and Practice ofHistory, ed.Georg G. Iggers andKonrad vonMoltke (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973), p. 58.
16. Hayden White, “Droysen’s Historik: Historical Writing as Bourgeois Science,” in his The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987), p. 99.
17. Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 26.
18. John Bagnell Bury, “The Science of History,” in The Varieties of History, ed. Stern, pp. 214-15.
19. Jon Elster, Political Psychology(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), chaps. 3-4.