Can a meta-analysis answer the question: Is mucosectomy and handsewn or double-stapled anastomosis better in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis?

American Surgeon

Volumn 72, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 912-916

  Schluender, Stefanie J ^a   Mei, Ling ^a   Yang, Huiying ^a   Fleshner, Phillip R ^a,b  

^a CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIDIARRHEAL AGENT;

ANASTOMOSIS; ANORECTAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEFECATION; FECES; FECES INCONTINENCE; FLATULENCE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; ILEAL POUCH ANUS ANASTOMOSIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MANOMETRY; META ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANAL CANAL; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; COLON POUCH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUTURING METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANTIDIARRHEALS; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; COLONIC POUCHES; DEFECATION; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FLATULENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PROCTOCOLECTOMY, RESTORATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33750737732     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 1978;8:5-8.
2. Kmiot WA, Keighley MR. Totally stapled abdominal restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1989;76:961-4.
3. Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995;222:120-7.
4. Fazio VW, O'Riordan MG, Lavery IC, et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg 1999;230:575-86.
5. Gemlo BT, Belmonte C, Wiltz O, Madoff RD. Functional assessment of ileal pouch-anal anastomotic technique. Am J Surg 1995;169:137-42.
6. Gozzetti G, Poggoili G, Marchetti F, et al. Functional outcome in handsewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1994;168:325-9.
7. McIntyre PB, Pemberton JH, Beart RW, et al. Double-stapled vs. handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. DCR 1994;37:430-3.
8. Michelassi F, Lee J, Rubin M, et al. Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann Surg 2003;238:433-45.
9. Tuckson W, Lavery I, Fazio V, et al. Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg 1991;161:90-6.
10. Sugarman HJ, Newsome HH. Stapled ileoanal anastomosis without a temporary ileostomy. Am J Surg 1994;167:58-64.
11. Hallgren TA, Fasth SB, Oresland TO, Hulten LA. Ileal pouch anal function after endoanal mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis compared with stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy. Eur J Surg 1993;161:915-21.
12. Luukkonen P, Jarvinen H. Stapled vs hand-sutured ileoanal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy: a prospective, randomized study. Arch Surg 1993;128:437-40.
13. Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, et al. Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa. Ann Surg 1997;225:666-77.
14. Seow-Choen F, Tsunoda A, Nicholls RJ. Prospective randomized trials comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomy versus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1991;78:430-4.
15. Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedure. Br Med J 1997;315:1533-7.
16. Mills E, Guyatt GH. Meta-analysis in context: assessing between and within study differences. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;1:210-5.
17. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, et al., eds. Methods for meta-analysis and medical research. Wiley, 2000.
18. Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, et al. J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patient. Br J Surg 1998;85:800-3.
19. Heald RJ, Allen DR. Stapled ileo-anal anastomosis: a technique to avoid mucosal proctectomy in the ileal pouch operation. Br J Surg 1986;73:571-2.
20. Keighley MR, Winslet MC, Yoshioka K, Lightwood R. Discrimination is not impaired by excision of the anal transitional zone after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1987;74:1118-21.
21. Lavery IC, Tuckson WB, Easley KA. Internal anal sphincter function after total abdominal colectomy and stapled IPAA without mucosal proctectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:950-3.
22. Schmitt SL, Wexner SD, Lucas FV, et al. Retained mucosa after double-stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:1051-6.
23. Thompson-Fawcett MW, Mortensen NJ, Warren BF, Path MRC "Cuffitis" and inflammatory changes in the columnar cuff, anal transitional zone, and ileal reservoir after stapled pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:348-55.
24. Gilchrist KW, Harms BA, Starling JR. Abnormal mucosa of the anal transition zone in ulcerative colitis. Arch Surg 1995;130:981-3.
25. Haray PN, Amarnath B, Weiss EG, et al. Short note: low malignant potential of the double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1996;83:1406.
26. O'Connell PR, Pemberton JH, Weland LH, et al. Does rectal mucosa regenerate after ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:1-5.
27. Tsunoda A, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ. Incidence of dysplasia in the anorectal mucosa in patients having restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1990;77:506-8.
28. Ravitch MM. The reception of new operations. Ann Surg 1984;200:231-46.
29. Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Delaney CP, et al. Dysplasia of the anal transition zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: results of prospective evaluation after minimum of ten years. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:6-13.
30. Rotholtz NA, Pikarsky AJ, Singh JJ, Wexner SD. Adenocarcinoma arising from along the rectal stump after double-stapled ileorectal J-pouch in a patient with ulcerative colitis: the need to perform a distal anastomosis: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1214-7.
31. Sequens R. Cancer in the anal canal (transition zone) after restorative proctocolectomy with stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997;12:254-5.
32. Slors JFM, Ponson AE, Taat CW, Bosma A. Risk of residual rectal mucosa after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal reconstruction with the double-stapling technique: postoperative endoscopic follow-up study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:207-10.
33. Stern H, Walfish S, Mullen B. Cancer in an ileoanal reservoir: a new late complication? Gut 1990;31:173-5.
34. Vrouenraetes BC, Duijvendij P, Bemelman WA, et al. Adenocarcinoma in the anal canal after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis using a double-stapled technique: report of two cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:530-4.
35. Ziv Y, Fazio VW, Sirimarco MT, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of dysplasia in the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1281-5.