Evidence of repair mechanisms in simultaneous interpreting: A corpus-based analysis

Interpreting

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-49

  Petite, Christelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Monitoring function; Pragmatics; Psycholinguistics; Repair mechanisms; Speech production; Speech reception

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750733677     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.7.1.03pet     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Beaugrande, R. de & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman
2. Berg, T. (1986a). The aftermath of error occurrence: Psycholinguistic evidence from cutoffs. Language and Communication 6 (3), 195-213
3. Berg, T. (1986b). The problems of language control: Editing, monitoring and feedback. Psychological Research 48, 133-144
4. Fromkin, V. A. (1973). Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague/Paris: Mouton
5. Gerver, D. (1974). The effects of noise on the performance of simultaneous interpreters: Accuracy of performance. Acta Psychologica 38, 159-167
6. Gile, D. (1995a). Regards sur la recherche en interprétation de conférence. Lille: Presses universitaires de Lille
7. Gile, D. (1995b). Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
8. Gile, D. (1997). Conference interpreting as a cognitive management problem. In J. H. Danks, G. M. Shreve, S. B. Fountain & M. K. McBeath (Eds.), Cognitive processes in translation and interpreting. London: Sage Publications, 196-214
9. Gile, D. (1998). Observational studies and experimental studies in the investigation of conference interpreting. Target 10 (1), 69-93
10. Gile, D. (1999). Testing the Effort Models' tightrope hypothesis in simultaneous interpreting - A contribution. Hermes. Journal of Linguistics 23, 153-172
11. Gile, D. (2000). Issues in interdisciplinary research into conference interpreting. In B. Englund Dimitrova & K. Hyltenstam (Eds.), Language processing and simultaneous interpreting. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 89-106
12. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-58
13. Gutt, E-A. (1991). Translation and relevance. Cognition and context. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
14. Isham, W. (1995). On the relevance of signed language to research in interpretation. Target 7 (1), 135-149
15. Lambert, S. (1994). Simultaneous interpreters: One ear maybe better than two. In S. Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 319-329
16. Laver, J. D. M. (1973). The detection and correction of slips of the tongue. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, 132-143
17. Laver, J. D. M. (1980). Monitoring systems in the neurolinguistic control of speech production. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand. New York: Academic Press, 287-305
18. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14, 41-104
19. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
20. MacKay, D. G. (1970). Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia 8, 323-350
21. Mason, I. (1999). Transcription conventions. The Translator 5 (2), 146
22. Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics. An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
23. Moser, B. (1978). Simultaneous interpretation: A hypothetical model and its practical application. In D. Gerver & H. W. Sinaiko (Eds.), Language interpretation and communication. New York/London: Plenum Press, 353-368
24. Nooteboom, S. G. (1980). Speaking and unspeaking: Detection and correction of phonological and lexical errors in spontaneous speech. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand. London: Academic Press, 87-96
25. Petite, C. (2004). Repair mechanisms in simultaneous interpreting. A corpus-based analysis of interpreters' deployment of processing resources (English/French/German). Unpublished PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
26. Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition 77, 97-131
27. Postma, A. & Kolk, H. (1993). The Covert Repair Hypothesis: Prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36, 472-487
28. Sabatini, E. (2000). Listening comprehension, shadowing and simultaneous interpretation of two 'non-standard' English speeches. Interpreting 5 (1), 25-48
29. Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G. Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the orga-nization of repair in conversation. Language 53 (2), 361-382
30. Setton, R. (1999). Simultaneous interpretation: A cognitive-pragmatic analysis. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins
31. Shlesinger, M. (1995). Shifts in cohesion in simultaneous interpreting. The Translator 1 (2), 193-214
32. Sommerlatte, S. (1994). Selbstkorrekturen als strategisches Handeln beim Simultandolmetschen Englisch/Deutsch. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Heidelberg
33. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
34. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1987). Précis of Relevance: Communication and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10, 697-754
35. Van Besien, F. & Meuleman, C. (2004). Dealing with speakers' errors and speakers' repairs in simultaneous interpretation. The Translator 10 (1), 59-81
36. Van Wijk, C. & Kempen, G. (1987). A dual system for producing self-repairs in spontaneous speech: Evidence from experimentally elicited corrections. Cognitive Psychology 19, 403-440
37. Vik-Tuovinen, G.-V. (2002). Retrospection as a method of studying the process of simultaneous interpreting. In G. Garzone & M.Viezzi (Eds.), Interpreting in the 21st Century. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 63-71