|
Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1321-1322
|
Is it time to rethink the urea criterion in CURB-65? [2]
a a,b c a,b |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
UREA;
AGED;
BREATHING RATE;
CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE;
COMMUNITY ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA;
CONFUSION;
DEATH;
DEHYDRATION;
DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
PREDICTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;
AGE;
BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA;
BLOOD;
BLOOD PRESSURE;
CLASSIFICATION;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
COMMUNICABLE DISEASE;
FEMALE;
HOSPITALIZATION;
LUNG FUNCTION TEST;
MALE;
MORTALITY;
NOTE;
PHYSIOLOGY;
AGE FACTORS;
AGED;
BLOOD PRESSURE;
COHORT STUDIES;
COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED INFECTIONS;
CONFUSION;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
PNEUMONIA, BACTERIAL;
RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;
UREA;
|
EID: 33750733258
PISSN: 09031936
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00019106 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (9)
|