Erosions of the artificial urinary sphincter: Risk factors, outcomes and management: Commentary

Nature Clinical Practice Urology

Volumn 3, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 580-581

  Diokno, Ananias C ^a  

^a WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLADDER SPHINCTER PROSTHESIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; CONTINENCE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DEMOGRAPHY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DIAPER; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INDWELLING CATHETER; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REIMPLANTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL RISK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE INCONTINENCE;

EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINARY SPHINCTER, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 33750726706     PISSN: 17434270     EISSN: 17434289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro0610     Document Type: Short Survey

References (2)

1. Scott FB et al. (1974) Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol 112: 75-80
2. Mulholland TL and Diokno AC (2004) The artificial urinary sphincter and urinary catheterization: What every physician should know and do to avoid serious complications. Int Urol Nephrol 36: 197-201