Technology, finance, and dependency: Latin American radical political economy in retrospect

Review of Radical Political Economics

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 551-568

  Vernengo, Matias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Dependency; Development; Sructuralism

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750719437     PISSN: 04866134     EISSN: 15528502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0486613406293220     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Agosin, M., and R. Mayer. 2000. Foreign investment in developing countries: Does it crowd in domestic investment? UNCTAD Discussion Papers no. 146. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
2. Arrighi, G. 1994. The long twentieth century: Money, power and the origins of our times. London: Verso.
3. Bagú, S. [1949] 1992. La economía de la sociedad colonial. México: Grijalbo.
4. Baran, P. [1957] 1968. The political economy of growth. New York: Monthly Review.
5. Baran, P., and P. Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly capital: An essay on the American economic and social order. New York: Monthly Review.
6. Bielschowsky, R. 1998. Evolución de las ideas de la CEPAL. Revista de la CEPAL (numero extraordinario) (October): 21-45.
7. Blomström, M., and B. Hettne. 1984. Development theory in transition. London: Zed.
8. Brenner, R. 1977. The origins of capitalist development: A critique of neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review (104) (July-August): http://www.newleftreview.net/A185.
9. Bresser-Pereira, L. C. 2000. After structuralism, a development alternative for Latin America. Oxford: Latin American Centre, St. Anthony's College.
10. Brewer, A. 1990. Marxist theories of imperialism: A critical survey. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
11. Cardoso, F. H. 1964. Desenvolvimento econômico e empresário industrial. São Paulo: Difel.
12. Cardoso, F. H. 1977. The consumption of dependency theory in the United States. Latin American Research Review 12 (3): 7-24.
13. Cardoso, F. H., and E. Faletto. [1967] 1970. Dependência e desenvolvimento na América Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
14. Cardoso de Mello, J. M. [1975] 1982. O capitalismo tardio. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
15. CEPAL. 1990. Transformación productiva con equidad. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
16. Chase-Dunn, C. 1982. A world-system perspective on "dependency and development in Latin America." Latin American Research Review 17 (1): 166-171.
17. Davidson, P. 1982. International money and the real world. London: Macmillan.
18. Davidson, P. 1990. A post-Keynesian positive contribution to "theory." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 13 (2) (Winter): 298-304.
19. Donghi, T. H. 1982. "Dependency theory" and Latin American sistoriography. Latin American Research Review 17 (1): 115-130.
20. Dos Santos, T. 1970. The structure of dependence. American Economic Review 60 (2) (May): 231-236.
21. Dos Santos, T. 2002. La teoría de la dependencia: Balance y perspectivas. Buenos Aires: Plaza & Janes.
22. Evans, P. 1979. Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state and local capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Fajnzylber, F. 1983. La industrialización trunca de América Latina. México: Nueva Imagen.
24. Fiori, J. L. 1997. Os moederios falsos. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes.
25. Fiori, J. L. 1999. Estados e moedas no desenvolvimento das nações. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes.
26. Frank, A. G. [1967] 1969. Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical studies of Brazil and Chile. New York: Monthly Review.
27. Furtado, C. 1959. Formação econômica do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura.
28. Furtado, C. 1966. Desarrollo y estancamiento en América Latina (enfoque estructuralista). Investigación Económica 29 (112) (January-March): http://www.educ.ar/educar/servlet/Downloads/ S_BD_DESARROLLOECONOMICO/PD000229.PDF.
29. Furtado, C. 1972. A análise do modelo Brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
30. Gilpin, R. 1987. The political economy of international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Goldenstein, L. 1994. Repensando a dependência. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
32. Grosfoguel, R. 2000. Developmentalism, modernity and dependency theory in Latin America. Neplanta 1 (2): 347-374.
33. Halliday, F. 2002. The pertinence of imperialism. In Historical materialism and globalization, ed. M. Rupert and H. Smith. London: Routledge.
34. Hausmann, R. 1999. Should there be five currencies or one hundred five? Foreign Policy (116) (Fall): 65-79.
35. Laclau, E. 1971. Feudalism and capitalism in Latin America. New Left Review 67 (May-June): http://www.newleftreview.net/?page= article&view=816.
36. Lippit, V. D. 1985. The concept of surplus in economic development. Review of Radical Political Economics 17 (1): 1-19.
37. Lustig, N. 1980. Underconsumption in Latin American economic thought: Some considerations. Review of Radical Political Economics 12 (1) (Spring): 35-43.
38. Mariátegui, J. C. [1928] 1979. Siete ensayos de interpretación de la realidad Peruana. México: Ediciones Era.
39. Marichal, C. 1989. A century of debt crises in Latin America: From independence to the great depression, 1820-1930. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. Noyola, J. 1956. El desarrollo económico y la inflación en México y otros países Latinoamericanos. Investigación Económica 16 (4): 603-616.
41. Ocampo, J. A. 2000. Recasting the international financial agenda. CEPA Working Paper no. 18. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
42. Ocampo, J. A. 2002. Half a lost decade. ECLAC Notes (24) (September): http://www.un.org/esa/desa/ousg/op-eds/oped05.html.
43. Ocampo, J. A., and M. A. Parra. 2003. Terms of trade for commodities in the twentieth century. Revista de la CEPAL 79 (April): 7-35.
44. O'Donnell, G. [1982] 1996. El estado burocrático autoritario: Triunfos, derrotas y crisis. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Belgrano.
45. Oliveira, F. 2003. The duckbilled platypus. New Left Review 24 (November-December): 40-57.
46. Palma, G. 1978. Underdevelopments and Marxism: From Marx to the theories of imperialism and dependency. Thames Papers in Political Economy, Summer. London: North East London Polytechnic.
47. Pasinetti, L. 1997. The social burden of high interest rates. In Capital controversy, post-Keynesian economics and the history of economics: Essays in honour of Geoff Harcourt, vol. 1, ed. P. Arestis, G. Palma, and M. Sawyer. London: Routledge.
48. Pinto, A. [1959] 1973. Chile: Un caso de desarrollo frustrado. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
49. Prado Júnior, C. [1942] 1987. Formação do Brasil contemporâneo. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
50. Prebisch, R. [1947] 1998. Keynes: Uma introdução. São Paulo: Ed. Brasiliense.
51. Prebisch, R. 1949. El desarrollo económico de América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
52. Rangel, I. [1963] 1978. A inflação Brasileira. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
53. Rocha, G. M. 2002. Neo-dependency in Brazil. New Left Review 16 (July-August): 5 - 33.
54. Rochon, L.-P., and M. Vernengo. 2003. State money and the real world: Chartalism and its discontents. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 26 (1) (Fall): 57-67.
55. Rodrik, D. 1999. The new global economy and developing countries: Making openness work. Overseas Development Council, Policy Essay no. 24. Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.
56. Rowthorn, B. 1981. Demand, real wages and economic growth. Thames Papers in Political Economy, Autumn. London: North East London Polytechnic.
57. Serrano, F. 2003. From "static" gold to the floating dollar. Contributions to Political Economy 22: 87-102.
58. Somel, C. 2003. Estimating the surplus in the periphery: An application to Turkey. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27 (6): 919-933.
59. Sutcliffe, B. 2002. How many capitalisms? Historical materialism in the debates about imperialism and globalization. In Historical materialism and globalization, ed. M. Rupert and H. Smith. London: Routledge.
60. Suter, C. 1989. Long waves in the international financial system: Debt-default cycles of sovereign borrowers. Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 12: 1-49.
61. Tavares, M. C. 1985. A retomada da hegemonia Americana. Revista de Economia Política 5 (2) (April-June): 5-16.
62. Tavares, M. C. 2000. Subdesenvolvimento, dominação e luta de classes. In Celso furtado e o Brasil, ed. M. C. Tavares. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo.
63. Tavares, M. C., and J. Serra. [1970] 1972. Além da estagnação. In Da substituição de importações ao capitalismo financeiro, ed. M. C. Tavares. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
64. Topik, S. 1998. Dependency revisited: Saving the baby from the bathwater. Latin American Perspectives 25 (6, issue 103) (November): 95-99.
65. Velasco, A. 2002. Dependency theory a generation later. Foreign Policy (133) (November-December): 45-47.
66. Vernengo, M. 2003a. After neoliberalism what's next for Brazil. Challenge 46 (5) (September-October): 59-75.
67. Vernengo, M. 2003b. Inversion externa y formacion de capital en Brasil, 1970-2000: Un abordaje neo-estructuralista. Investigacion Economica 62 (246) (October-December): 125-147.
68. Vernengo, M., and L.-P. Rochon. 2001. Kaldor and Robinson on money and growth. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 8 (1): 75-103.
69. Wallerstein, I. 1979. The capitalist world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Wallerstein, I. 2003. The decline of American power: The U.S. in a chaotic world. New York: New Press.
71. Yeldan, E. 1995. Surplus creation and extraction under structural adjustment: Turkey, 1980-1992. Review of Radical Political Economics 27 (2): 38-72.