Luminosity and the safety of knowledge

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 396-406

  Neta, Ram ^a   Rohrbaugh, Guy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750719328     PISSN: 02790750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2004.00207.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Brueckner, Anthony and Fiocco, M. Oreste (2002). "Williamson's Anti-luminosity Argument," Philosophical Studies 110. pp. 285-293.
2. Conee, Earl (Forthcoming). "The Comforts of Home," Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
3. Goldman, Alvin (1976). "Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge." Journal of Philosophy 73, pp. 771-91.
4. Neta, Ram (2002). "S knows that p," Nous 36, pp. 663-681.
5. Sosa, Ernest (1999). "How to Defeat Opposition to Moore," in Tomberlin (1999).
6. Sosa, E. (2000). "Contextualism and Skepticism," Philosophical Issues XI: Supplement to Noûs.
7. Sosa, E. (Forthcoming). "Relevant Alternatives, including Contextualism," Philosophical Studies.
8. Tomberlin, James (ed.) (1999). Philosophical Perspectives 13: Epistemology. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Williamson, Timothy (1996). "Cognitive Homelcssncss," Journal of Philosophy 93, pp. 554-73.
10. Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. New York: Oxford University Press.