Advanced gastric carcinoma with signet ring cell carcinoma versus non-signet ring cell carcinoma: Differentiation with multidetector CT

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 880-884

  Lee, Jei Hee ^a,c   Park, Mi Suk ^b,c   Kim, Ki Whang ^b   Yu, Jeong Sik ^c   Kim, Myeong Jin ^c   Yang, Seok Woo ^c   Lee, Yong Chan ^b  

^a Ajou University Medical CentSuwon   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Signet ring cell carcinoma; Stomach cancer

Indexed keywords

CELLS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY;

CELL CARCINOMA; CELL TYPES; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; GASTRIC CARCINOMA; INNER LAYER; MULTIDETECTOR CT; SIGNET RING CELL CARCINOMA; STOMACH CANCER;

CYTOLOGY;

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INFILTRATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SIGNET RING CARCINOMA; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STOMACH CARCINOMA; STOMACH WALL; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION;

EID: 33750716928     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000220800.76276.46     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Maehara Y, Sakaguchi Y, Moriguchi S, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. Cancer. 1992;69:1645-1650.
2. Fenoglio-Preser C, Munoz N, Carneior F, et al. Gastric carcinoma. In: Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System. Lyon: IARC Press, 2000:35-52.
3. Theuer CP, Nastanski F, Brewster WR, et al. Signet ring cell histology is associated with unique clinical features but does not affect gastric cancer survival. Am Surg. 1999;65:915-921.
4. Adachi Y, Yasuda K, Inomata M, et al. Pathology and prognosis of gastric carcinoma: well versus poorly differentiated type. Cancer. 2000;89:1418-1424.
5. Kim JP, Kim SC, Yang HK. Prognostic significance of signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. Surg Oncol. 1994;3:221-227.
6. Otsuji E, Yamaguchi T, Sawai K, et al. Characterization of signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. J Surg Oncol. 1998;67:216-220.
7. Yang XF, Yang L, Mao XY, et al. Pathobiological behavior and molecular mechanism of signet ring cell carcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a comparative study. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:750-754.
8. Cho JS, Kim JK, Rho SM, et al. Preoperative assessment of gastric carcinoma: value of two-phase dynamic CT with mechanical iv. injection of contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:69-75.
9. D'Elia F, Zingarelli A, Palli D, et al. Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging of gastric cancer: correlation with pathological findings. A prospective study of 107 cases. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1877-1885.
10. Ba-Ssalamah A, Prokop M, Uffmann M, et al. Dedicated multidetector CT of the stomach: spectrum of diseases. Radiographics. 2003;23:625-644.
11. Park MS, Yu JS, Kim MJ, et al. Mucinous versus nonmucinous gastric carcinoma: differentiation with helical CT. Radiology. 2002;223:540-546.
12. Lee JK, Glazer HS. Controversy in the MR imaging appearance of fibrosis. Radiology. 1990;177:21-22.
13. Hyung WJ, Noh SH, Shin DW, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of mucinous gastric adenocarcinoma. Yonsei Med J. 1999;40:99-106.