Diabetes self-management education program for Medicaid recipients: A continuous quality improvement process

Diabetes Educator

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 893-900

  Balamurugan, Appathurai ^a,b   Ohsfeldt, Robert ^c   Hughes, Tom ^d   Phillips, Martha ^e  

^a Arkansas Department Health and Human Services   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC DIET; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAID; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; REVIEW; SELF CARE; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC DIET; HUMANS; MEDICAID; NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SELF CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33750711399     PISSN: 01457217     EISSN: 15546063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0145721706294787     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guide to community preventive services: diabetes. Available at http://www.thecommunityguide.org/diabetes/ default.htm. Accessed April 14, 2005.
2. Engelgau MM, Geiss LS, Saaddine JB, et al. The evolving diabetes burden in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(suppl):945-950.
3. Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:917-932.
4. Ettaro L, Songer TJ, Zhang P, Engalgau MM. Cost-of illness studies in diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22:149-164.
5. Klonoff DC, Schwartz DM. An economic analysis of interventions for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:390-404.
6. Zhang P, Engelgau M, Norris S, Gregg E, Narayan KMV. Application of economic analysis to diabetes and diabetes care. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(suppl):972-977.
7. American Association of Diabetes Educators. CQI: A Step-by-Step Guide for Quality Improvement in Diabetes Education. Chicago, Ill: American Association of Diabetes Educators; 2005.
8. National Diabetes Surveillance System. Data & trends. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/preventive/tY.htm. Accessed May 31, 2005.
9. American Association of Diabetes Educators. The Guide to Reimbursement. Chicago, Ill: American Association of Diabetes Educators; 2003.
10. Pearson J, Mensing C, Anderson R. Medicare reimbursement and diabetes self-management training: national survey results. Diabetes Educ. 2004;30:914-927.
11. Balanced Budget Act of 1997, §4105 (1998).
12. Funnell MM, Hunt C, Kulkarni K, Rubin RR, Yarborough PC, eds. A Core Curriculum for Diabetes Education. 3rd ed. Chicago, Ill: American Association of Diabetes Educators; 1998.
13. Norris SL, Engelgau M, Narayan KMV. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:561-587.
14. International Classification of Diseases codes [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site]. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/ otheract/icd9/abticd9.htm. Accessed June 7, 2005.
15. Current Procedural Terminology codes [American Medical Association Web site]. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/3113.html. Accessed June 7, 2005.
16. Iennoni LI, ed. Risk Adjustment for Measuring Healthcare Outcomes. 2nd ed. Chicago, Ill: Health Administration Press; 1997.
17. Gilmer TP, O'Connor PJ, Manning WG, Rush WA. The cost to health plans of poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1847-1853.
18. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risks of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837-853.
19. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Andrew H, et al. Association of glycemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321:405-412.
20. Stevens RJ, Kothari V, Adler AI, et al. The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in type II diabetes (UKPDS 56). Clin Sci. 2001;101:671-679.
21. Kothari V, Stevens RJ, Adler AI, et al. UKPDS 60: risk of stroke in type 2 diabetes estimated by the UK prospective diabetes study risk engine. Stroke. 2002;33:1776-1781.
22. Saydah SH, Fradkin J, Cowie CC. Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA. 2004;291:335-342.
23. Balamurugan A. The state of diabetes in Arkansas. Available at: http://www.healthyarkansas.com/services/pdf/diabetes_in_arkansas.pdf. Accessed June 7, 2003.
24. Weintraub WS, Craver JM, Jones EL, et al. Improving cost and outcome of coronary surgery. Circulation. 1998:98(suppl 1):II23-II28.
25. Sarasin FP, Gaspoz J-M, Bounameaux H. Cost-effectiveness of new antiplatelet regimens used as secondary prevention of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2773-2778.