Pouch-anal anastomosis vs straight ileoanal anastomosis in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis

Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Volumn 41, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1799-1808

  Tilney, Henry S ^a   Constantinides, Vasilis ^a   Ioannides, Adonis S ^b   Tekkis, Paris P ^a   Darzi, Ara W ^a   Haddad, Munther J ^b  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ileal pouch; Meta analysis; Pediatric; Restorative proctocolectomy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA ANALYSIS; EMBASE; HUMAN; ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; SALVAGE THERAPY; SEPSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS COLI; CHILD; COLITIS, ULCERATIVE; HUMANS; PROCTOCOLECTOMY, RESTORATIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33750707587     PISSN: 00223468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Wewer V., Hesselfeldt P., Qvist N., et al. J-pouch ileoanal anastomosis in children and adolescents with ulcerative colitis: functional outcome, satisfaction and impact on social life. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 40 (2005) 189-193
2. Gunther K., Braunrieder G., Bittorf B.R., et al. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis experience better bowel function and quality of life after ileorectal anastomosis than after ileoanal pouch. Colorectal Dis 5 (2003) 38-44
3. Fonkalsrud E.W., Thakur A., and Beanes S. Ileoanal pouch procedures in children. J Pediatr Surg 36 (2001) 1689-1692
4. Clarke M., and Horton R. Bringing it all together: Lancet-Cochrane collaborate on systematic reviews. Lancet 357 (2001) 1728
5. Moher D., Cook D.J., Eastwood S., et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 354 (1999) 1896-1900
6. Mantel N., and Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22 (1959) 719-748
7. DerSimonian R., and Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7 (1986) 177-188
8. Egger M., and Smith G.D. Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 311 (1995) 753-754
9. Egger M., Davey Smith G., Schneider M., et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315 (1997) 629-634
10. Downs S.H., and Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52 (1998) 377-384
11. Bodzin J.H., Kestenberg W., Kaufmann R., et al. Mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal pull-through technique and functional results in 23 consecutive patients. Am Surg 53 (1987) 363-367
12. Durno C., Sherman P., Harris K., et al. Outcome after ileoanal anastomosis in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 27 (1998) 501-507
13. Fonkalsrud E.W., and Loar N. Long-term results after colectomy and endorectal ileal pullthrough procedure in children. Ann Surg 215 (1992) 57-62
14. Fonkalsrud E.W. Update on clinical experience with different surgical techniques of the endorectal pull-through operation for colitis and polyposis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 165 (1987) 309-316
15. Kolster C.E., Moore D., Carpenter S., et al. Ileoanal anastomosis with and without reservoir in children and adolescents with ulcerative rectocolitis and familial polyposis. G E N 43 (1989) 261-265
16. Johnston D., Williams N.S., Neal D.E., et al. The value of preserving the anal sphincter in operations for ulcerative colitis and polyposis: a review of 22 mucosal proctectomies. Br J Surg 68 (1981) 874-878
17. Taylor B.M., Cranley B., Kelly K.A., et al. A clinico-physiological comparison of ileal pouch-anal and straight ileoanal anastomoses. Ann Surg 198 (1983) 462-468
18. Taylor B.M., Beart Jr. R.W., Dozois R.R., et al. Straight ileoanal anastomosis v ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after colectomy and mucosal proctectomy. Arch Surg 118 (1983) 696-701
19. Telander R.L., Spencer M., Perrault J., et al. Long-term follow-up of the ileoanal anastomosis in children and young adults. Surgery 108 (1990) 717-723
20. Perrault J., Telander R.L., Zinsmeister A.R., et al. The endorectal pull-through procedure in children and young adults: a follow-up study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 7 (1988) 89-94
21. Odigwe L., Sherman P.M., Filler R., et al. Straight ileoanal anastomosis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in the surgical management of idiopathic ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis coli in children: follow-up and comparative analysis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 6 (1987) 426-429
22. Rintala R.J., and Lindahl H. Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in children-is the J-pouch better than straight pull-through?. J Pediatr Surg 31 (1996) 530-533
23. Coran A.G. A personal experience with 100 consecutive total colectomies and straight ileoanal endorectal pull-throughs for benign disease of the colon and rectum in children and adults. Ann Surg 212 (1990) 242-247
24. Fonkalsrud E.W. Long-term results after colectomy and ileoanal pull-through procedure in children. Arch Surg 131 (1996) 881-885
25. Rintala R.J., and Lindahl H.G. Proctocolectomy and J-pouch ileo-anal anastomosis in children. J Pediatr Surg 37 (2002) 66-70
26. Lal D.R., Nichol P.F., Harms B.A., et al. Ileo-anal S-pouch reconstruction in patients with total colonic aganglionosis after failed pull-through procedure. J Pediatr Surg 39 (2004) e7-e9