What are we mainstreaming when we mainstream gender?

International Feminist Journal of Politics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 496-512

  Eveline, Joan ^a   Bacchi, Carol ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Embodied processes; Feminist theory; Gender as verb; Gender mainstreaming models

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750703902     PISSN: 14616742     EISSN: 14684470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14616740500284417     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Abella, R. 1984. Report of the Commission on Equality in Employment. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
2. Acker, J. 1990. 'Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations', Gender and Society 4: 139-58.
3. Bacchi, C. 1990. Same Difference: Feminism and Sexual Difference. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
4. Bacchi, C. 1999. Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. London: Sage.
5. Bacchi, C. 2004. 'Gender/ing Impact Assessment: Can it be Made to Work?', Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies 9 (2): 93-111.
6. Bacchi, C. and Eveline, J. 2004. 'Mainstreaming and Neoliberalism: A Contested Relationship', Policy and Society: Journal of Public, Foreign and Global Policy 22 (2): 98-118.
7. Beveridge, F., Nott, S. and Stephen, K. 2000. 'Moving Forward with Mainstreaming', in Beveridge, F., Nott, S. and Stephen, K. (eds) Making Women Count: Integrating Women Into Law and Policy-Making, pp. 277-85. Aldershot: Ashgate.
8. Bly, R. 1990. Iron John. Shaftesbury: Element Books Limited.
9. Brittan, A. 1989. Masculinity and Power. New York: Blackwell.
10. British Columbia. 1993. Gender Lens: A Guide to Gender-inclusive Policy and Program Development. Vancouver: Ministry of Women's Equality.
11. Bulbeck, C. 1998. Re-Orienting Western Feminisms. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
12. Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
13. Carrigan, T., Connell, R. and Lee, J. 1985. 'Toward a New Sociology of Masculinity', Theory and Society 14 (5): 551-604.
14. Chodorow, N. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15. Citizenship and Immigration Canada. 2002. Gender-Based Analysis at CIC: Training Handout. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.
16. Cockburn, C. 1991. In the Way of Women: Men's Resistance to Women in Organizations. London: Macmillan Education.
17. Colebrook, C. 2001. 'From Radical Representations to Corporeal Becomings: The Feminist Philosophy of Lloyd, Grosz and Gatens', Hypatia 15 (2): 76-93.
18. Collinson, D. and Hearn, J. 1994. 'Naming Men as Men: Implications for Work, Organisation and Management', Gender, Work and Organization 1 (1): 2-22.
19. Connell, R. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
20. Connell, R. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Essed, P., Goldberg, D. and Kobayashi, A. (eds) 2004 A Companion to Gender Studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
22. Eveline, J. 1994. 'The Politics of Advantage', Australian Feminist Studies 19: 129-54.
23. Eveline, J. 1995. 'Surviving the Belt Shop Blues: Women Miners and Critical Acts', Australian Journal of Political Science 30: 91-107.
24. Eveline, J. 1998. 'Heavy, Dirty and Limp Stories: Male Advantage at Work', in Gatens, M. and MacKinnon, A. (eds) Gender and Institutions: Welfare, Work and Citizenship, pp. 90-106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Ferguson, K. 1984. The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
26. Fulcher, G. 1989. Disabling Policies? A Comparative Approach to Education Policy and Disability. East Sussex: The Falmer Press.
27. Gatens, M. 1983. 'A Critique of the Sex/Gender Distinction', in Allen, J. and Patton, P. (eds) Beyond Marxism? Interventions After Marx, pp. 143-63. Sydney: Intervention Publications.
28. Gatens, M. 1996. 'Through a Spinozist Lens: Ethology, Difference, Power', in Patton, P. (ed.) Deleuze: A Critical Reader, pp. 162-87. Oxford: Blackwell.
29. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Hearn, J. 1992. Men in the Public Eye. London: Routledge.
31. Hoagland, S. 1988. Lesbian Ethics: Toward New Value. Palo Alto, CA: Institute of Lesbian Studies.
32. Hull, G. T., Scott, P. B. and Smith, B. (eds) 1982. All the Women are White, All the Blacks are Men, But Some of us are Brave. New York: The Feminist Press.
33. Irigaray, L. 1985. This Sex Which is Not One. Trans. Porter, C. and Burke, C. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34. Jahan, R. 1995. The Elusive Agenda: Mainstreaming Women in Development. London: Zed Books.
35. Kabeer, N. 1994. 'Gender Aware Policy and Planning: A Social Relations Perspective', in MacDonald, M. (ed.) Gender Planning in Developing Agencies: Meeting the Challenge, pp. 81-97. Oxford: Oxfam.
36. Kasic, B. 2004. 'Feminist Cross Mainstreaming within "East- West" Mapping', European Journal of Women's Studies 11 (4): 473-85.
37. Kerfoot, D. and Knights, D. 1996. 'The Best is Yet to Come', in Collinson, D. and Hearn, J. (eds) Men as Managers, Managers as Men, pp. 78-99. London: Sage.
38. Levy, C., Taher, N. and Vouhe, C. 2000. 'Addressing Men and Masculinities in GAD', IDS Bulletin 31 (2): 86-96.
39. MacKinnon, C. A. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. McClure, K. 1992. 'The Issue of Foundations: Scientized Politics, Politicized Science and Feminist Critical Practice', in Butler, J. and Scott, J. (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political, pp. 341-68. New York: Routledge.
41. March, C., Smyth, I. and Mukhodpadhyay, M. 1999. A Guide to Gender Analysis Frameworks. Oxford: Oxfam.
42. Mitchell, J. 2004. 'Procreative Mothers (Sexual Difference) and Child-Free Sisters (Gender)', European Journal of Women's Studies 11 (4): 415-26.
43. Moi, T. 1999. 'What is a Woman?: Appropriating Bordieu: Feminist Theory and Pierre Bordieu's Sociology of Culture', in Moi, T. What is a Woman and Other Essays, pp. 264-99. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Mohanty, C.T. 1991. 'Cartographies of Struggle: Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism', in Mohanty, C. T., Russo, A. and Torres, L. (eds) Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, pp. 1-47. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
45. Nichols, J. 1975. Men's Liberation. New York: Penguin
46. O'Brien, M. 1981. The Politics of Reproduction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
47. Parsons, T. and Bales, R. 1955. Family, Socialisation and the Interaction Process. New York: Free Press.
48. Plantenga, J. 2000. Gender Impact Assessment and Employment Strategy: The Case of the Netherlands. External Report commissioned and presented to the European Commission. Available at http://www.umist.ec.uk/management/ewerc/ publications/ 2000-2001.html.
49. Sandoval, C. 1991. 'U.S. Third World Feminism: The Theory and Method of Oppositional Consciousness in the Postmodern World', Genders 10: 1-24.
50. Scott, J. W. 1990. 'Deconstructing Equalify-versus-Difference, or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism', in Hirsch, M. and Fox Keller, E. (eds) Conflicts in Feminism, pp. 134-48. New York: Routledge.
51. Spelman, E. V. 1988. Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
52. Status of Women Canada. 1997. Gender-based Analysis Backgrounder. Available at http://www.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca/wb-bmof/publications/ab-backg.shtml.
53. Status of Women Canada. 2001. Gender-Based Analysis (GBA) Policy Training: Participant Handbook. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.
54. Staudt, K. 2003. 'Gender Mainstreaming: Conceptual Links to Institutional Machineries', in Rai, S. M. (ed.) Mainstreaming Gender, Democratizing the State: Institutional Mechanisms in the Advancement of Women, pp. 40-65. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
55. Verloo, M. 2000. 'Making Women Count in The Netherlands', in Beveridge, F., Nott, S. and Stephen, K. (eds) Making Women Count: Integrating Gender into Law and Policy-making, pp. 49-75. Dartmouth: Ashgate.
56. Verloo, M. and Roggeband, C. 1996. 'Gender Impact Assessment: The Development of a New Instrument in the Netherlands', Impact Assessment 14 (1): 3-21.
57. Weeks, J. 1977. Coming Out: Homosexual Politics in Britain, from the Nineteenth Century to the Present. London: Quartet.
58. West, C. and Zimmerman, D. 2003. 'Doing Gender', in Ely, R., Foldy, E. and Scully, M. (eds) Reader in Gender, Work and Organization, pp. 62-74. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
59. White, S. 1994. 'Making Men an Issue: Gender Planning for "the Other Half"', in Macdonald, M. (ed.) Gender Planning in Development Agencies: Meeting the Challenge, pp. 98-109. Oxford: Oxfam.
60. Wishik, H. and Pearce, C. 1991. Sexual Orientation and Identity: Heterosexual, Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Journeys. Laconics, NH: New Dynamics Publications.
61. Woodward, A. and Meier, P. 1997. 'Gender Impact Assessment: Tool in Mainstreaming or Tool to begin Mainstreaming? A Comparison of Dutch and Flemish Approaches'. Paper for the ECPR Joint Sessions, Bern.
62. Young, I. M. 2002. 'Lived Body vs. Gender: Reflections on Social Structure and Subjectivity', Ratio XV (December): 410-28.