Statistical analyses for R-index

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 584-600

  Bi, Jian ^a  

^a Sensometrics Research and Service   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750698228     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2006.00084.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. BAMBER, D. 1975. The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. J. Math. Psychol. 12, 387-415.
2. BERGER, R.L. and HSU, J.C. 1996. Bioequivalence trials, intersection-union tests and equivalence confidence sets (with discussions). Stat. Sci. 11, 283-319.
3. BI, J. 2005. Similarity testing in sensory and consumer research. Food Qual. Prefer. 16, 139-149.
4. BI, J. and O'MAHONY, M. 1995. Table for testing the significance of the R-index. J. Sensory Studies 10, 341-347.
5. BICKEL, P.J. and DOKSUM, K.A. 1977. Mathematical Statistics: Basic Ideas and Selected Topics. Holden-Day, Inc., San Francisco, CA.
6. BIRNBAUM, Z.W. 1956. On a use of the Mann-Whitney statistic. In Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol 1 (J. Neyman, ed.) pp. 13-17, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
7. BLACKWELDER, W.C. 1982. "Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials 3, 345-353.
8. BOFINGER, E. 1985. Expanded confidence intervals. Commun. Stat. A-Theor. 14, 1849-1864.
9. BOFINGER, E. 1992. Expanded confidence intervals, one-side tests, and equivalence testing. J. Biopharm. Stat. 2, 181-8.
10. BROWN, J. 1974. Recognition assessed by rating and ranking. Br. J. Psychol. 65, 13-22.
11. CENTOR, R.M. and SCHWARTZ, J.S. 1985. An evaluation of methods for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Med. Decis. Making 5, 150-156.
12. CLIFF, N. 1993. Dominance statistics: Ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Psychol. Bull. 114(3), 494-509.
13. CLIFF N. and KEATS, J.A. 2003. Ordinal Measurement in the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ.
14. DELONG, E.R., DELONG, D.M. and CLARK-PEARSON, D.L. 1988. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44, 837-845.
15. DORFMAN, D.D. and ALF, E. 1969. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals - rating method data. J. Math. Psychol. 6, 487-496.
16. EGAN, J.P. 1975. Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis. Academic Press, New York, NY.
17. GREEN, D.M. 1964. General prediction relating yes-no and forced-choice results. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, 1042. (Abstract).
18. GREEN, D.M. and SWETS, J.A. 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
19. HANLEY, J.A. and MCNEIL, B.J. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143, 29-36.
20. HOCHBERG, Y. 1981. On the variance estimate of a Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney statistic for group ordered data. Commun. Stat.-Theor. M. A10(17), 1719-1732.
21. HSU, J.C. 1984. Constrained two-sided simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple comparisons with the best. Ann. Stat. 12, 1136-1144.
22. HSU, J.C., HWANG, J.T.G., LIU, H-K. and RUBERG, S.J. 1994. Confidence intervals associated with tests for bioequivalence. Biometrika 81, 103-114.
23. LEHMANN, E.L. 1975. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. Holden-Day, San Francisco, CA.
24. MANN, H.B. and WHITNEY, D.R. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 18, 50-56.
25. MCNEIL, D.R. 1967. Efficiency loss due to grouping in distribution-free tests. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 62, 954-965.
26. NOETHER, G.E. 1967. Elements of Nonparametric Statistics. Wiley, New York, NY.
27. O'MAHONY, M. 1979. Short-cut signal detection measures for sensory analysis. J. Food Sci. 44, 302-303.
28. O'MAHONY, M. 1982. Some assumptions and difficulties with common statistics for sensory analysis. Food Technol. 32, 75-82.
29. O'MAHONY, M. 1986. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Statistical Methods and Procedures. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
30. O'MAHONY, M. 1988. Sensory difference and preference testing: The use of signal detection measures. In Applied Sensory Analysis of Foods (H. Moskowitz, ed.) pp. 145-175, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
31. O'MAHONY, M. 1992. Understanding discrimination tests: A user-friendly treatment of response bias, rating and ranking R-index tests and their relationship to signal detection. J. Sensory Studies 7, 1-47.
32. SCHUIRMANN, D.J. 1987. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalent of average bioavailability. J. Pharmacokinet. Biop. 15, 657-668.
33. SIMONOFF, J.S., HOCHBERG, Y. and REISER, B. 1986. Alternative estimation for Pr(X < F) in categorized data. Biometrics 42, 895-907.
34. THURSTONE, L.L. 1954. Some new psychophysical methods. In Food Acceptance Testing Methodology (D.R. Peryam, F.S. Pilgrim and M. Peterson, eds.) pp. 100-104. National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council, Washington, DC.
35. VAN DANTZIG, D. 1951. On the consistency and the power of Wilcoxon's two sample test. Nederlandse Akad. Westensch. Proc. Ser. A 54, 1-8.
36. WILCOXON, F. 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics 1, 80-83.