Some empirical regularities in market shares

Management Science

Volumn 52, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1792-1798

  Kohli, Rajeev ^a   Sah, Raaj ^b  

^a 506 Uris Hall ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Competitive strategy; Marketing; Product policy

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVE STRATEGY; MARKET SHARES; POWER LAW; PRODUCT POLICY;

COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; MARKETING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 33750692318     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: 15265501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0572     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Adamic, L. A., B. A. Huberman. 2000. The nature of markets in the World Wide Web. Quart. J. Electronic Commerce 1 5-12.
2. Bass, F. M. 1995. Empirical generalizations and marketing: A personal view. Marketing Sci. 14(3, Part 2) G6-G19.
3. Buzzell, R. D. 1981. Are there "natural" market structures? J. Marketing 45(1) 42-52.
4. Chung, K. H., R. A. K. Cox. 1994. A stochastic model of super-stardom: An application of the Yule distribution. Rev. Econom. Statist. 76(4) 771-775.
5. Deaton, A., J. Muellbauer. 1980. Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. Ehrenberg, A. S. C. 1982. Lawlike relationships. Res. Marketing Ser. 82(1), London Business School, London, UK.
7. Ehrenberg, A. S. C. 1995. Empirical generalizations, theory and methods. Marketing Sci. 14(3, Part 2) G20-G28.
8. Ehrenberg, A. S. C., M. D. Uncles, G. J. Goodhardt. 2004. Understanding brand performance measures: Using Dirichlet benchmarks. J. Bus. Res. 57(12) 1307-1325.
9. Gabaix, X. 1999. Zipf's law for cities. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3) 738-767.
10. Hill, B. M. 1974. The rank-frequency form of Zipf's law. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69(348) 1017-1026.
11. Ijiri, Y., H. A. Simon. 1975. Some distributions associated with Bose-Einstein statistics. Proc. National Acad. Sci. 72(5) 1654-1657.
12. Jacobson, R., D. A. Aaker. 1985. Is market share all that it's cracked up to be? J. Marketing 49(4) 11-22.
13. Kalyanaram, G., W. T. Robinson, G. L. Urban. 1995. Order of market entry: Established empirical generalizations, emerging empirical generalizations, and future research. Marketing Sci. 14(3) G212-G221.
14. Kohli, R., R. Sah. 2006. Some patterns of market shares of brands within and across product categories. Working paper, Columbia Business School, New York.
15. Lindsey, R. M., E. Ehrenberg. 1993. The design of replicated studies. Amer. Statistician 47(3) 217-228.
16. Mandelbrot, B. 1963. New methods in statistical economics. J. Political Econom. 71(5) 421-440.
17. Rubinson, J. R., W. R. Vanhonacker, F. M. Bass. 1980. On "A parsimonious description of the Hendry system." Management Sci. 26(2) 215-226.
18. Simon, H. A. 1968. On judging the plausibility of theories. B. van Rootselaar, J. F. Staal, eds. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Sciences III. North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 439-459.
19. Uncles, M. D., M. Wright. 2004. Empirical generalisation in marketing. Australasian Marketing J. 12(3) 5-18.