Genetic relationships among Turkish sheep

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 513-524

  Uzun, Metehan ^a   Gutiérrez Gil, Beatriz ^b   Arranz, Juan José ^b   San Primitivo, Fermín ^b   Saatci, Mustafa ^c   Kaya, Mehmet ^a   Bayon, Yolanda ^b  

^a KAFKAS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEÓN   (Spain)

^c KAFKAS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

DNA microsatellites; Genetic relationships; Local sheep breeds

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; SHEEP;

OVIS ARIES;

MICROSATELLITE DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SHEEP; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BREEDING; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHYLOGENY; SHEEP, DOMESTIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TURKEY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33750685646     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/gse:2006018     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Akcapinar H., Koyun Yetistiriciligi, 2nd edn., Ismat Matbacilik, Ankara, 2000.
2. Akcapinar H., Ozbeyaz C., Hayvan yetistiriciligi temel bilgileri, 1st edn., Kariyer Matbaacilik, Ankara, 1999.
3. Arranz J.J., Bayón Y., San Primitivo F., Differentiation among Spanish sheep breeds using microsatellites, Genet. Sel. Evol. 33 (2001) 529-542.
4. Baumung R., Simianer H., Hoffman I., Genetic diversity studies in farm animals - a survey, J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 121 (2004) 361-373.
5. Belkhir K., Borsa P., Goudet J., Chikhi L., Bonhomme F., GENETIX, logiciel sous WindowsTM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, 1996.
6. Bruford M.W., Bradley D.G., Luikart G., DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication, Nat. Rev. Genet. 4 (2003) 900-910.
7. Edding J.H., Laval G., Measuring genetic uniqueness in livestock, in: J.K. Oldenbroeck (Ed.), Genebanks and the Conservation of Farm Animal Genetic Resources, DLO Inst. Anim. Sci. and Health, Lelystad, 1999, pp. 33-58.
8. FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Secondary Guidelines for Development of National Farm Animal Genetic Resources Management Plans. Measurement of Domestic Animal Diversity (MoDAD): Original Working Group Report, http://dad.fao.org./en/refer/library/guidelin/workgrp.pdf, 1998.
9. Giuffra E., Kijas J.M.H., Amarger V., Carlborg Ö., Jeon J.-T., Andersson L., The origin of the domestic pig: independent domestication and subsequent introgression, Genetics 154 (2000) 1785-1791.
10. Gupta A.K., Origin of agriculture and domestication of plants and animals linked to early Holocene climate amelioration, Curr. Sci. 87 (2004) 54-59.
11. Gutiérrez-Gil B., Uzun M., Arranz J.J., San Primitivo F., Yildiz S., Cenesiz M., Bayón Y., Genetic diversity in Turkish sheep, Acta Agr. Scand. Am (In press) DOI: 10.1080/09064700600641681.
12. Hiendleder S., Mainz K., Plante Y., Lewalski H., Analysis of mitochondrial DNA indicates that domestic sheep are derived from two different ancestral maternal sources. No evidence for contributions from urial and argali sheep, J. Hered. 89 (1998) 113-120.
13. Hiendleder S., Kaupe B., Wassmuth R., Janke A., Molecular analysis of wild and domestic sheep questions current nomenclature and provides evidence for domestication from two different subspecies, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 269 (2002) 893-904.
14. Langella O., POPULATIONS 1.2.29. Population genetic software (individuals or populations distances, phylogenetic trees), http://www.cnrs-gif.fr/pge, 2004.
15. Laval G., SanCristobal M., Chevalet C., Measuring genetic distances between breeds: use of some distances in various short term evolution models, Genet. Sel. Evol. 34 (2002) 481-507.
16. MacHugh D.E., Shriver M.D., Loftus R.T., Cunningham P., Bradley D.G., Microsatellite DNA variation and the evolution, domestication and phylogeography of taurine and zebu cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus), Genetics 146 (1997) 1071-1086.
17. Maijala K., Genetic aspects of domestication, common breeds and origin, in: L. Piper, A. Ruvinsky (Eds.), The Genetics of Sheep, CAB International, Wallingford, 1997, pp. 13-49.
18. Mason I.L., A world dictionary of livestock breeds, types and varieties, 4th edn., C.A.B. International, 1996.
19. Nei M., Genetic distance between populations, Am. Nat. 106 (1972) 283-292.
20. Pedrosa S., Uzun M., Arranz J.J., Gutiérrez-Gil B., San Primitivo F., Bayón Y., Evidence of three maternal lineages in Near Eastern sheep supporting multiple domestication events, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 272 (2005) 2211-2217.
21. Reynolds J., Weir B.S., Cokerham C.C., Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance, Genetics 105 (1983) 767-779.
22. Ryder M.L., Sheep, in: I.L. Mason (Ed.), Evolution of Domesticated Animal, Longman, London, 1984, pp. 63-85.
23. Saitou N., Nei M., The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees, Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 (1987) 406-425.
24. Soysal M.I., Özkan E., Gürcan E.K., The status of native farm animal genetic diversity in Turkiye and in the world, Trakia J. Sci. 3 (2003) 1-12.
25. Yarkin I., Eker M., Kars cevresinde yetisitirlen Tuj koyunu uzerinde calismalar, A.U. Ziraat Fak. Yilligi. 26 (1954) 376-388.