The use of morphological and AFLP markers in diversity analysis of linseed

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 3193-3205

  Adugna, W ^a   Labuschagne, M T ^a   Viljoen, C D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE   (South Africa)

Author keywords

AFLP; Genetic diversity; Linseed; Morphology

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; POLYMORPHISM; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RELATEDNESS; SEED;

AFRICA; EAST AFRICA; ETHIOPIA; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA;

EID: 33750684364     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-6970-8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adugna W. and Labuschagne M.T. 2002. Genotype-environment interactions and phenotypic stability analyses of linseed in Ethiopia. Plant Breeding 121: 66-71.
2. Altaf Khan M., Myers G.O. and Stewart G.M. 2002. Molecular markers, genomics and cotton improvement. In: Kang M.S. (ed.), Crop Improvement Challenges in the Twenty First Century. Food Products Press ®, New York, pp. 253-284.
3. Barret B.A., Kidwell K.K. and Fox P.N. 1998. Comparison of AFLP and pedigree-based genetic diversity assessment methods using wheat cultivars from the Pacific Northwest. Crop Science 38: 1271-1277.
4. Ben-Har A., Charcrosset A., Bourgoin M. and Guiard J. 1995. Relationships between genetic markers and morphological traits in a maize inbred lines collection. Euphytica 84: 145-154.
5. Blakeney M. 2002. Intellectual property, biological diversity, and agricultural research in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53: 127-147.
6. Burstin J. and Charcrosset A. 1997. Relationships between phenotypic and marker distance: theoretical and experimental investigations. Heredity 78: 477-483.
7. Edwards K., Johnstone C. and Thompson C. 1991. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 19: 1349-1358.
8. Frankel O.H. 1989. Practical considerations relevant to effective evaluation. In: Brown A.H.D., Frankel O.H., Marshall D.R. and Williams J.T. (eds), The Use of Plant Genetic Resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 235-260.
9. Guthridge K.M., Dupal M.P., Kolliker R., Jones E.S., Smith K.F. and Forster J.W. 2001. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and between populations of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Euphytica 122: 191-201.
10. Hintze J.L. 1998. NCSS 2000 Statistical System for Windows. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems, Kaysville, Utah.
11. Kumar L.S. 1999. DNA markers in plant improvement: An overview. Biotechnology Advances 17: 143-182.
12. Lombard V., Tireau B., Blouet F., Zhang D. and Baril C.P. 2002. Usefulness of AFLP markers to estimate varietal homogeneity of rapeseed inbred line varieties in the context of plant registration and protection. Euphytica 125: 121-127.
13. Lubberstedt T., Melchinger A.E., Fahr S., Klein D., Dally A. and Westhoff P. 1998. QTL mapping in test crosses of flint lines of maize: III. Comparison across population for forage traits. Crop Science 38: 1278-1289.
14. Mackil D.J., Zhang Z., Redona E.D. and Colwit P.M. 1996. Level of polymorphism and genetic mapping of AFLP markers in rice. Genome 39: 969-977.
15. PE (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems) 2002. http://www.perkine.elmmer.com.
16. Poehlman J.M. 1987. Breeding Field Crops. Third Edition. AVI Publishing Company, Inc., Westport, Connecticut, New York.
17. Powell W., Morgante M., Andre C., Hanafey M.M., Vogel J., Tingey S. and Rafalski A. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP, and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Molecular Breeding 2: 225-238.
18. Roldan-Ruiz I., van Eeuwijk F.A., Gilliland T.J., Dubreuil P., Dillmann C., Lallemand J., De Lose M. and Baril C.P. 2001. A comparative study of molecular and morphological methods of describing relationships between perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 1138-1150.
19. Sneath P.H.A. and Sokal R.R. 1993. Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco, USA.
20. Swanepoel E. 1999. Identification of genetic distances and heterotic groups of inbred maize (Zea mays) lines using DNA fingerprinting. MSc Thesis, Department of Plant Breeding, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
21. Tohme J., Gonzalez D.O., Beebe S. and Duque. 1996. AFLP analysis of gene pools of a wild bean core collection. Crop Science 36: 1375-1384.
22. UPOV. 1991. International convention for the protection of new varieties of plant. http://www.upov.int.