Pre and post functional endoscopic sinus surgery nasal cavity volume assessment by acoustic rhinometry

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 549-553

  Santos, Rodrigo De Paula ^a   Habermann, Walter ^a,b   Hofmann, Thiemo ^a,b   Stammberger, Heinz ^a,b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Nasal polips; Paranasal sinus; Sinusitis

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTIHISTAMINIC AGENT; CORTICOSTEROID;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; HUMAN; MALE; NOSE CAVITY; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; NOSE SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RHINOMETRY; RHINOSINUSITIS; SENSATION; VOLUMETRY;

EID: 33750630097     PISSN: 18088694     EISSN: 18088686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)31003-x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Stammberger H, Posawetz W. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: concepts, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique. Eur Arch Otorrhinolaryngol 1990;240:63-76.
2. Messerklinger W. Endoscopy of the nose. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1978. p. 1-18.
3. Stammberger H. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. The Messerklinger technique. Philadelphia: B.C. Decker; 1991. p. 1-278.
4. Kennedy DW. Prognostic factors, outcomes and staging in ethmoid sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1992;102(57):1-18.
5. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflections. J Appl Physiol 1989;66:295-303.
6. Jackson AC, Butler JB, Millet EJ, Hoppin FG, Dawson SV. Airway geometry by analysis of acoustic pulse response measurements. J Appl Physiol 1977;43(3):523-36.
7. Zinreich SJ, Kennedy DW, Rosembaum AE, Gayler BW, Kumar AJ, Stammberger H. CT of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: imaging requirements for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. J Radiol 1987;163:769-75.
8. Stammberger H. Endoscopic endonasal surgery - new concepts in the treatment of recurring sinusitis. Part. II: surgical technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;94:143-7.
9. Committee On Standardization Of Acoustic Rhinometry. Recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures. European Rhinologic Society/International Symposium of Infection and Allergy of the Nose, Meeting. 28 July-1 August, 1998, Vienna, Áustria.
10. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, Shpirer I, Hoffstein V, Zamel N. Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope 1995;105:275-81.
11. Szücs E, Clement PAR. Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in the evaluation of nasal patency of patients with nasal septal deviation. Am J Rhinol 1998;12:345-52.
12. Lazar RH, Younes RT, Long TE. Functional endonasal sinus surgery in adults and children. Laryngoscope 1993;103:1-5.
13. Levine HL. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: evaluation, surgery and follow-up of 250 patients. Laryngoscope 1990;100:79-84.
14. Lund VJ, Mackay IS. Outcome assessment of endoscopic sinus surgery. Proceedings of Royal Society of Medicine 1994;87:70-2.
15. Rice DH. Endoscopic sinus surgery: results at two-years follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;101:476-9.
16. Grymer LF. Reduction rhinoplasty and nasal patency: change in the cross-sectional area of the nose evaluated by acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 1995;105(4pt1):429-31.
17. Hilberg O, Grymer LF, Pedersen OF, Elbrond O. Turbinate hypertrophy: evaluation of the nasal cavity by acoustic rhinometry. Arch Otolaryngol Head and Neck Surg 1990;116:283-9.
18. Lildholdt T. Surgical versus medical treatment of nasal polyps. Rhinol Suppl 1989;8:31-3.
19. Elbrond O, Hilberg O, Felding JU, Pederson OF, Andersen OB. Acoustic rhinometry, used as a method to demonstrate changes in the volume of the nasopharynx after adenoidectomy. Clin Otolaryngol 1991;16: 84-6.
20. Lenders H, Schaeffer J, Pirsig W. Turbinate hypertrophy in habitual snorers and patients with obstructive sleep apnea: findings of acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope 1991;101:614-8.
21. Djupesland PG, Kaastad E, Franzén G. Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of congenital choanal malformations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1997;41:319-37.
22. Czaja JM, Mccaffrey TV. Acoustic measurement of subglottic stenosis. Ann Otol Laryngol 1996;105:504-9.
23. Carlini D. Rinometria acústica na avaliação de pacientes entre 7 e 13 anos de idade com obstrução nasal por rinite crônica hipertrófica não infecciosa. [tese]. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Escola Paulista de Medicina; 1999.
24. Lund VJ, Scadding GK. Objective assessment of endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis: an update. J Laryngol Otol 1994;108(9):749-53.
25. Grymer LF, Hilberg O, Pedersen OF, Rasmussen TR. Acoustic rhinometry: values from adults with subjective normal nasal patency. Rhinology 1991;29:35-47.
26. Hofmann T, Wolf G, Luxenberger W, Loidolt DL, Berghold A. Der stellenwert objektiver messverfahren der nasenatmung bei rhinochirurgischen eingriffen. Trabalho apresentado no "27th International Scientific Meeting / 1st Combined Graz - Mayo Clinic Workshop on Functional Endoscopic Sinus Techniques"; September 7th to 9th, 2000, Graz, Áustria.
27. Reber M, Rahm F, Monnier PH. The role of acoustic rhinometry in pre- and postoperative evaluation of surgery for nasal obstruction. Rhinology 1998;36:184-7.
28. Schmäl F, Deitmer TH. Untersuchungen zur beurteilbarkeit der nasendurchgängigkeit. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 1993;72:611-3.
29. Tomkinson A, Eccles R. Comparison of the relative abilities of acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and the visual analogue scale in detecting change in the nasal cavity in a healthy adult population. Am J Rhinol,1996;10:161-5.