|
Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 223-232
|
Is the argument from marginal cases obtuse?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
ANIMAL;
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR;
ANIMAL EXPERIMENT;
ANIMAL RIGHTS;
ANIMAL WELFARE;
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
COGNITION;
ETHICAL THEORY;
ETHICS;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;
SPECIES DIFFERENCE;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;
ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION;
ANIMAL RIGHTS;
ANIMAL WELFARE;
ANIMALS;
BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;
COGNITION;
ETHICAL ANALYSIS;
ETHICAL THEORY;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
HUMANS;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
SPECIES SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 33750622813
PISSN: 02643758
EISSN: 14685930
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00334.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (20)
|
References (10)
|