A water quality monitoring network design methodology for the selection of critical sampling points: Part II

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 122, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 319-334

  Strobl, R O ^a   Robillard, P D ^b   Day, R L ^c   Shannon, R D ^d   McDonnell, A J ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b World Water Watch   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d University Park   (United States)

^e The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical source areas; Design methodology; Monitoring network; Sampling points; Water quality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMPURITIES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHOSPHORUS; WATERSHEDS;

CRITICAL SOURCE AREAS; DESIGN METHODOLOGY; SAMPLING NETWORKS; WATER QUALITY MONITORING;

WATER QUALITY;

PHOSPHORUS; STORM WATER;

AIR SAMPLING; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

AGRICULTURAL WASTE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; LAND USE; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER LOADING; WATER QUALITY; WATER SAMPLING; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN; WATER POLLUTION;

EID: 33750618363     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-0358-4     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Barnes, P. L.: 1997, Row Crop Pollution Control in Northeast Kansas Kansas State University.
2. Evans, B. M.: 2002, 'Development of an Automated GIS-Based Modeling Approach to Support Regional Watershed Assessments', Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
3. Gburek, W. J. and Folmar, G. J.: 1999, 'Flow and chemical contributions to streamflow in an upland watershed: A baseflow survey', J. Hydrol. 217, 1-18.
4. Haith, D. A., Mandel, R. and Wu, R. S.: 1992, GWLF - Generalized Watershed Loading Functions, Version 2.0 - User's Manual, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
5. Honisch, M., Hellmeier, C. and Weiss, K.: 2002, 'Response of surface and subsurface water quality to land use changes', Geoderma 105, 277-298.
6. Izurieta, J., Gómez, M. A., Evans, B. E. and Mijangos, M. A.: 2001, 'Evaluación de la contaminación difusa en la cuenca del Río Apatlaco', in XI Congreso Nacional de Irrigación. Simposio 5, Manejo Integral de Cuencas, September 19-21, Guanajuato, México.
7. Lee, K.-Y., Fisher, T. R., Jordan, T., Correll, D. L. and Weller, D.E.: 2000, 'Modeling the hydrochemistry of the Choptank River basin using GWLF and GIS', Biogeochemistry 49, 143-173.
8. McDowell, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., Beegle, D. B. and Weld, J. L.: 2001, 'Comparing phosphorus management strategies at a watershed scale', J. Soil Water Conserv. 56, 306-315.
9. Pionke, H. B., Gburek, W. J. and Sharpley, A. N.: 2000, 'Critical source area controls on water quality in an agricultural watershed located in the Chesapeake Basin', Ecol. Eng. 14, 325-335.
10. Strobl, R. O., Robillard, P. D., Shannon, R. D., Day, R. L. and McDonnell, A.J.: 2006, - A water quality monitoring network design methodology for the selection of critical sampling points. Part I, Environ. Monit. Assess. 112(1-3), 137-158.
11. Vieux, B. E. and Farajalla, N. S.: 1994, 'Capturing the essential spatial variability in distributed hydrological modelling: Hydraulic roughness', Hydrol. Process. 8, 221-236.