A living will clause for supporters of animal experimentation

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 173-189

  Sztybel, David ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL RIGHTS; ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLASSIFICATION; COGNITION; DISEASE MODEL; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIVING WILL; MAMMAL; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL STRESS; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC OPINION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION; ANIMAL RIGHTS; ANIMAL USE ALTERNATIVES; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; AUTOEXPERIMENTATION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COGNITION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; ETHICAL THEORY; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; LIVING WILLS; MAMMALS; MENTAL COMPETENCY; PUBLIC OPINION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 33750617499     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00338.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. J. Robbins, Diet for a New America (Walpole, NH: Stillpoint Publishing, 1987).
2. L. Pifer, K. Shimizu and R. Pifer, ‘Public attitudes toward animal research: some international comparisons’, Society and Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies 2, 2 (1994). See http://www.psyeta.org, the website of Psychologists for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
3. P. Singer, ‘Animals and the value of life’ in T. Regan (ed.) Matters of Life and Death (New York: Random House, 1980), p. 254
4. A. Schweitzer, ‘The ethic of reverence for life’ in T. Regan and P. Singer (eds.) Animal Rights and Human Obligations, 2nd edn. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989), p. 36.
5. S. F. Sapontzis, Morals, Reason, and Animals (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987), pp. 209–16
6. J. Dunayer, Animal Equality: Language and Liberation (Derwood, MD: Ryce Publishing, 2001), p. 105
7. R. Sharpe, The Cruel Deception: The Use of Animals in Medical Research (Wellingborough, Northamptonshire: Thorsons Publishers Limited, 1988), p. 90.
8. H. Ruesch, Slaughter of the Innocent (New York: CIVITAS, 1983), p. 189.
9. S. F. Sapontzis, ‘Speciesism’, Between the Species 4 (Spring) (1988): 98.
10. B. Rollin, Animal Rights and Human Morality (Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books, 1981), pp. 25–6, discusses how animals may be able to think in terms of recalled images.
11. R. G. Frey, ‘Animal parts, human wholes’ in J. M. H. Humber and R. F. Almeder (eds.) Biomedical Ethics Reviews — 1987 (Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, 1981), p. 89.
12. T. Regan, The Case for Animal Rights (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1983) p. 173