40 Years DEGAM: Research in general practice in Germany - Development and current situation;40 Jahre DEGAM: Allgemeinmedizinische forschung in Deutschland - Entwicklung und aktueller stand

Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin

Volumn 82, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 409-414

  Hummers Pradier, Eva ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENERAL PRACTICE; GERMANY; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ORGANIZATION; REVIEW; UNIVERSITY;

EID: 33750616757     PISSN: 09376801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-942188     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Schwartz FW. Forschung und Allgemeinmedizin: Grundlagen und Forderungen. Prakt Arzt 1983; 9: 665-673
2. Braun RN. Die gezielte Diagnostik in der Praxis. Schattauer, Stuttgart 1957
3. Braun RN. Wege und Ergebnisse einer Systematischen Erforschung der Allgemeinpraxis. In: Brandmeier P, Krüsi G (Hrsg). Der Praktische Arzt heute. Huber, Bern, Stuttgart 1968
4. NN. Is Primary-care research a lost cause? Lancet 2003; 361: 977
5. De Maeseneer JM, van Driel ML, Green LA, et al. The need for research in primary care. Lancet 2003; 362: 1314-1319
6. De Maeseneer JM, De Sutter A. Why research in family medicine? A superfluous question. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2 (Suppl 2): S17-S22
7. Mant D, Del Mar C, Glasziou P, et al. The state of primary care research. Lancet 2004; 364: 1004-1006
8. st century: the age of family medicine research. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2 (Suppl 2): S50-S54
9. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003; 290: 1624-1632
10. Ovhed I, van Royen P, Hakansson A. What is the future of primary care research? Probably fairly bright, if we may believe the historical development. Scand J Prim Health Care 2005; 23: 248-253
11. van der Zee J, Kroneman M, Bolibar B. Conditions for research in general practice. Can the Dutch and British experiences be applied to other countries, for example Spain? Eur J Gen Pract 2003; 9: 41-47
12. Kochen MM. Excellence in primary care research: which requirements are needed? Eur J Gen Pract 2003; 9: 39-40
13. Szecsenyi J, Engelhardt N, Wessel M, et al. A method for determining the denominator in general practice - results of a pilot study. Gesundheitswesen 1993; 55: 32-36
14. Ballast M. Versorgungsforschungskongress. Ludwigshafen, Vortrag 2006
15. Macfarlane F, Shaw S, Greenhalgh T, et al. General practices as emergent research organizations: a qualitative study into organizational development. Fam Pract 2005; 22: 298-304
16. Wissenschaftsrat. Stellungnahme zu den Perspektiven des Fachs Allgemeinmedizin an den Hochschulen, http://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/texte/3848- 98.pdf. (Zugriff am 1.7.2006)
17. Kochen MM, Himmel W. A critical assessment of the impact factor. Eur J Gen Pract 1998; 4: 159-163
18. The PLoS Medicine Editors. The impact factor game. PLoS Medicine 2006; 3: e291 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291
19. Mendis K, Solangaarachchi I. PubMed perspective of family medicine research: where does it stand? Fam Pract 2005; 22: 570-575
20. Himmel W, Kochen MM. Zwischen Habilitation und Juniorprofessur: Alternativen für Allgemeinmedizin und Klinische Medizin. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 2003; 97: 157-161
21. Dreibholz KJ. Morbidität in der Allgemeinmedizin. Prakt Arzt 1979; 10: 1412-1422