Examining the effect of residential change on intimate partner violence risk

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 60, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 923-927

  Waltermaurer, E ^a   McNutt, L A ^b   Mattingly, M J ^c  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHORT ANALYSIS; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; DATA SET; HEALTH RISK; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; VIOLENCE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; DATA BASE; DEMOGRAPHY; DYNAMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MODEL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OFFENDER; PARTNER VIOLENCE; RISK FACTOR; VICTIM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CRIME VICTIMS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPOUSE ABUSE; VIOLENCE;

EID: 33750612066     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2006.047084     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services (CDC). Costs of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Atlanta: GA Centers for Disease Control, 2003.
2. Jaffe P, Wolfe D, Wilson S, et al. Emotional and physical health problems of battered women. Can J Psychiatry 1986;31:625-9.
3. Mullen P, Romans-Clarkson S, Walton V, et al. Impact of sexual and physical abuse on women's mental health. Lancet 1988;1:841-5.
4. Bergman B, Brismar B. A 5-year follow-up study of 118 battered women. Am J Public Health 1991;81:1486-9.
5. Koss M, Koss P, Woodruff W. Deleterious effects of criminal victimization on women's health and medical utilization. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:342-7.
6. Coker A, Hall-Smith P, Bethea L, et al. Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:451-7.
7. Campbell J, Jones A, Dienemann J, et al. Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1157-63.
8. McNutt LA, Carlson BE, Persaud M, et al. Cumulative abuse experiences, physical health and health behaviors. Ann Epidemiol 2002;12:123-30.
9. Bachman R, Saltzman L. Violence against women: estimates from the redesigned survey, Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, 1995.
10. Rennison C, Welchans S. Intimate partner violence, BJS Special Report Series. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, 2000.
11. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998.
12. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, Research report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, 2001.
13. Coker A, Oldendick R. Intimate partner violence among men and women-South Carolina, 1998. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 2000;49:691-4.
14. Bensley L, MacDonald S, Van Eenwyk J, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence and injuries, 1998. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 2000;49:589-92.
15. Schwartz M. Marital status and woman abuse theory. J Fam Violence 1988;3:239-49.
16. Lauritsen J. The social ecology of violent victimization: individual and contextual effects in the NCVS. J Quant Criminal 2001;17:3-32.
17. Tseloni A. Personal criminal victimization in the United States: fixed and random effects of individual and household characteristics. J Quant Criminol 2000;16:415-42.
18. Campbell J. "If I can't have you, no one can": power and control in homicide of female partners. In: Radford J, Russell D, eds. Femicide: the politics of woman killing. Boston, MA: Twayne, 1992:1-29.
19. Dugan L, Nagin D S, Rosenfeld R. Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence legislation on intimate-partner homicide. Law Soc Rev 2003;37:169-98.
20. Block C, Skogan W. Do collective efficacy and community capacity make a difference "Behind closed doors?" Report to the US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, 2002.
21. Flitcraft A, Hadley S, Hendricks-Matthews M, et al. American Medical Association diagnostic and treatment guidelines on domestic violence. Arch Fam Med 1992;1:39-47.
22. McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, et al. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:940-3.
23. United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs (BJS). National Crime Victimization Survey, 1992-2003, ICPSR Report 3995. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2004.
24. Dugan L, Castro J. Comparing predictors of violent victimization for NCVS women with those for incarcerated women. In: Heimer, Kruttschnitt, eds. Gender and crime: patterns in victimization and offending. New York, NY: New York University Press, 2005.
25. Van Wyk J, Benson M, Fox G, et al. Detangling individual-, partner-, and community-level correlates of partner violence. Crime Delinq 2003;49:412-38.
26. Sampson R, Wilson W. Toward a theory of race, crime and urban inequality. In: Hagan J, Peterson R, eds. Crime and inequality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995.