Rolling with the changes: A role congruity perspective on gender norms

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 369-383

  Diekman, Amanda B ^a   Goodfriend, Wind ^b,c  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BUENA VISTA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750603713     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: 14716402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00312.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116-132.
2. Astin, A. W., Oseguera, L., Sax, L. J., & Korn, W. S. (2002). The American freshman: Thirty-five-year trends, 1966-2001. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography, 37, 401-414.
5. Brewer, L. (2001). Gender socialization and the cultural construction of elder caregivers. Journal of Aging Studies, 15, 217-235.
6. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 420-444.
7. Cancian, F. M., & Olinker, S. J. (2000). Caring and gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
8. Carli, L. L., LaFleur, S. J., & Loeber, G. C. (1995). Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1030-1041.
9. Center for American Women and Politics. (2005). Women in elective office 2005. New Brunswick, NJ: Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
10. Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413-423.
11. Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 4th ed. (Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Diekman, A. B. (2005). Negotiating the double bind: A role congruity perspective on evaluations of dominance. Unpublished manuscript.
13. Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188.
14. Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (in press). Of men, women, and motivation: A role congruity account. In J. Shall & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivational science. New York: Guilford.
15. Diekman, A. B., Goodfriend, W., & Evans, C. (2005). The influence of role beliefs on stereotype content: An individualdifference approach. Unpublished manuscript.
16. Diekman, A. B., Goodfriend, W., & Goodwin, S. (2004). Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceived change and stability in gender hierarchies. Sex Roles, 50, 201-215.
17. Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitiide-in-context. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19-35). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
18. Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Koenig, A. M. (2004). Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 796-816.
19. Eagly, A. H., & Karan, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
20. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
21. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.
22. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
23. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. England, P. (2003). Toward gender equality: Progress and bottlenecks. Working paper. Retrieved Aug. 22, 2006 from http://www.northwestern.edu/ipr/ publications/papers/2003/WP-03-13.pdf
25. England, P., Budig, M., & Folbre, N. (2002). The wages of virtue: The relative pay of care work. Social Problems, 49, 455-473.
26. Fullerton, H. N., Jr. (1999). Labor force participation: 75 years of change, 1950-98 and 1998-2025. Monthly Labor Review, 122, 3-12.
27. Geis, F. L. (1993). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A social psychological view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The. psychology of gender (pp. 9-54). New York: Guilford.
28. Glick, P. (1991). Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles, 25, 351-378.
29. Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.
30. Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psycholog, 89, 416-427.
31. Hoffman, C., & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197-208.
32. Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). Another look at sex differences in preferred mate characteristics: The effects of endorsing the traditional female gender role. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 322-328.
33. Jost, J. T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. In G. Moskowitz (Ed.), Future directions in social cognition (pp. 89-102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
35. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-509.
36. Judd, P. C., & Oswald, P. A. (1997). Employment desirability: The interactive effects of gender-typed profile, stimulus sex, and gender-typed occupations. Sex Roles, 37, 467-476.
37. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 4th ed (Vol. 2, pp. 233-265). New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Kite, M. E. (2001). Changing times, changing gender roles: Who do we want women and men to be? In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 215-227). New York: Wiley.
39. Kite, M. E., Russo, N. F., Brehm, S. S., Fouad, N. A., Hall, C. C. I., Hyde, J. S., et al. (2001). Women psychologists in academe: Mixed progress, unwarranted complacency. American Psychologist, 56, 1080-1098.
40. Lerner, M. J. (2003). The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 388-399.
41. Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269-281.
42. Ritter, B. A., & Yoder, J. D. (2004). Gender differences in leader emergence persist even for dominant women: An updated confirmation of role congruity theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 187-193.
43. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645.
44. Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157-176.
45. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004-1010.
46. Sayer, L. C., Bianchi, S. M., & Robinson, J. P. (2004). Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers' and fathers' time with children. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1-43.
47. Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305-325.
48. Warner, J. (2005, February 21). Myth of the perfect mother. Newsweek, CXLV, 42-49.
49. Wilde, A., & Diekman, A.B. (2005). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in dynamic stereotypes: A comparison between Germany and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 188-196.