Commercial cord blood banking: Immediate cord clamping is not safe [14]

British Medical Journal

Volumn 333, Issue 7574, 2006, Pages 919-

  Hutchon, David J R ^a  

^a DARLINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD BANK; BLOOD SAMPLING; EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD; CORD BLOOD STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; FETUS BLOOD; LIGATION; NEWBORN; NOTE; SAFETY;

BLOOD BANKS; CONSTRICTION; CORD BLOOD STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; FETAL BLOOD; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; SAFETY;

EID: 33750603303     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Edozien LC. NHS maternity units should not encourage commercial banking of umbilical cord blood. BMJ 2006;333:801-4. (14 October.)
2. Rabe H, Reynolds G, Diaz-Rossello J. Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(4):CD003248.
3. Mercer JS, Vohr, BR, McGrath MM, Padbury JF, Wallach M, Oh W. Delayed cord clamping in very preterm infants reduces the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage and late-onset sepsis: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2006;117:1235-42.