Incarceration-based drug treatment

Preventing Crime: What Works for Children, Offenders, Victims, and Places

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 103-116

  Mitchell, Ojmarrh ^a   MacKenzie, Doris Layton ^b   Wilson, David B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750600104     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4244-2_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Belenko, Steven, Jordon. Peugh, and Joseph A. Califano. 1998. Behind Bars: Substance Abuse and America's Prison Population. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
2. Dugan, John R., and Ronald S. Everett. 1998. An Experimental Test of Chemical Dependency Therapy for Jail Inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 42: 360-368.
3. Eisenberg, Michael. 2001. The Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Program: Evaluation and Recommendations. Austin, TX: Criminal Justice Policy Council.
4. Eisenberg, Michael, and Tony Fabelo. 1996. Evaluation of the Texas Correctional Substance Abuse Treatment Initiative: The Impact of Policy Research. Crime & Delinquency 42: 296-308.
5. Farrington, David P., Denise C. Gottfredson, Lawrence W. Sherman, and Brandon C. Welsh. 2002. "The Maryland Scientific Methods Scale." In Evidence-Based Crime Prevention, edited by Lawrence W. Sherman, David P. Farrington, Brandon C.Welsh, and Doris Layton MacKenzie, 13-21. New York, NY: Routledge.
6. Field, Gary. 1985. The Cornerstone Program: A Client Outcome Study. Federal Probation 49: 50-55.
7. -. 1989. A Study of the EVects of Intensive Treatment on Reducing the Criminal Recidivism of Addicted Offenders. Unpublished manuscript. Salem, OR: Oregon Correctional Treatment Programs.
8. Gerstein, Dean R., and Hernick J. Harwood, eds. 1990. Treating Drug Problems: A Study of the Evolution, Effectiveness, and Financing of Public and Private Drug Treatment Systems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. Gransky, Laura A., and Robert J. Jones. 1995. Evaluation of the Post-Release Status of Substance Abuse Program Participants. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
10. Hartmann, David J., James L. Wolk, L. Scott Johnston, and Corey J. Colyer. 1997. Recidivism and Substance Abuse Outcomes in a Prison-Based Therapeutic Community. Federal Probation 61: 18-25.
11. Hasselblad, Vic, and Larry V. Hedges. 1995. Meta-Analysis of Screening and Diagnostic Tests. Psychological Bulletin 117: 167-178.
12. Hughey, Ray, and Lloyd W. Klemke. 1996. Evaluation of a Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program. Federal Probation 60: 40-44.
13. Inciardi, James A., Steven S. Martin, Clifford A. Butzin, Robert M. Hooper, and Lana D. Harrison. 1997. An Effective Model of Prison-Based Treatment for Drug-Involved Offenders. Journal of Drug Issues 27: 261-279.
14. Knight, Kevin, D. Dwayne Simpson, and Matthew Hiller. 1999. Three-Year Reincarceration Outcomes for In-Prison Therapeutic Community Treatment in Texas. Prison Journal 79: 337-351.
15. Lipsey, Mark W., and David B. Wilson. 2001. PracticalMeta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Lipton, Douglas S. 1995. The Effectiveness of Treatment for Drug Abusers Under Criminal Justice Supervision.Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
17. -. 1998. Treatment for Drug Abusing Offenders During Correctional Supervision: A Nationwide Overview. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 26: 1-45.
18. Little, Gregory L., Kenneth D. Robinson, and Katherine D. Burnette. 1991. Treating Drug Offenders with Moral Reconation Therapy: A Three-Year Recidivism Report. Psychological Reports 69: 1151-1154.
19. Lo, Celia C., and Richard C. Stephens. 2000. Drugs and Prisoners: Treatment Needs on Entering Prison. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 26: 229-245.
20. MacKenzie, Doris Layton. 2002. "Reducing the Criminal Activities of Known Offenders and Delinquents: Crime Prevention in the Courts and Corrections. In Evidence-Based Crime Prevention, edited by Lawrence W. Sherman, David P. Farrington, Brandon C.Welsh, and Doris Layton MacKenzie, 330-404. New York: Routledge.
21. Magura, Stephen, Andrew Lewis, Carla Rosenblum, and Herman Joseph. 1993. The Effectiveness of In-Jail Methadone Maintenance. Journal of Drug Issues 23: 75-99.
22. Mumola, Christopher J. 1999. Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners, 1997. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
23. National Institute of Drug Abuse. 1999. Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research-Based Guide. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
24. Oregon Department of Corrections. 1994. Comparison of Outcomes and Costs: Residential and Outpatient Treatment Programs for Inmates: Alcohol and Drug, Mental Health, Sex Offender, and Social Skills Treatment. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Corrections.
25. Pelissier, Bernadette, William Rhodes, William Saylor, Gerry Gaes, Scott D. Camp, Suzy D. Vanyur, and Sue Wallace. 2000. T RIAD Drug Treatment Evaluation Project Final Report of T hree-Year Outcomes: Part I. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Evaluation, Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice.
26. Peters, Roger H., Paul E. Greenbaum, John F. Edens, Chris R. Carter, and Madeline M. Ortiz. 1998. Prevalence of DSM-IV Substance Abuse and Dependence Disorders Among Prison Inmates. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 24: 573-587.
27. Peters, Roger H., William D. Kearns, Mary R. Murrin, Addis S. Dolente, and Robert L. May II. 1993. Examining the Effectiveness of In-Jail Substance Abuse Treatment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 19: 1-39.
28. Prendergast, Michael L., Jean Wellisch, and Mamie Mee Wong. 1996. Residential Treatment for Women Parolees Following Prison-Based Drug Treatment Experiences, Needs and Services, and Outcomes. Prison Journal 76: 253-274.
29. Sealock, Miriam D., Denise C. Gottfredson, and Catherine A. Gallagher. 1997. Drug Treatment for Juvenile Offenders: Some Good and Bad News. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 34: 210-236.
30. Shaw, James W., and Doris L. MacKenzie. 1992. The One-Year Community Supervision Performance of Drug Offenders and Louisiana DOC-Identified Substance Abusers Graduating from Shock Incarceration. Journal of Criminal Justice 20: 501-516.
31. Siegal, Harvey A., Jichuan Wang, Russel S. Falck, Ahmmed M. Rahman, and Robert G. Carlson. 1997. An Evaluation of Ohio's Prison-Based T herapeutic Community Treatment Programs for Substance Abusers: Final Report. Dayton, OH: School of Medicine,Wright State University.
32. Smith, Cindy J. 1996. The California Civil Addict Program: An Evaluation of Implementation and Effectiveness. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Irvine, CA: University of California, Irvine.
33. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Office of Applied Studies (SAMSHA). 1998. Preliminary Results from the 1997 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
34. Taxman, Faye S., and David L. Spinner. 1996. The Jail Addiction Services (JAS) Project in Montgomery County,Maryland. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
35. Tunis, Sandra, James Austin, Mark Morris, Patricia Hardyman, and Melissa Bolyard. 1995. Evaluation of Drug Treatment in L ocal Corrections: Final Report. San Francisco, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
36. Washington State Department of Corrections. 1988. Substance Abuse Treatment Program Evaluation of Outcomes andManagement Report. Olympia,WA: Author.
37. Wexler, Harry K., Gregory P. Falkin, and Douglas S. Lipton. 1990. Outcome Evaluation of a Prison Therapeutic Community for Substance Abuse Treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior 17: 71-92.
38. Wexler, Harry K.,Wendy F. Graham, Renee Koronkowski, and Lois Lowe. 1995. Amity T herapeutic Community Substance Abuse Program: Preliminary Return to Custody Data - May 1995. Laguna Beach, CA: National Development and Research Institutes.
39. Wexler, Harry W., George DeLeon, George Thomas, David Kressell, and Jean Peters. 1999a. The Amity Prison TC Evaluation: Reincarceration Outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior 26: 147-167.
40. Wexler, Harry K., Gerald Melnick, Lois Lowe, and Jean Peters. 1999b. Three-Year Reincarceration Outcomes for Amity In-Prison Therapeutic Community and Aftercare in California. Prison Journal 79: 321-336.
41. Zhang, Sheldon. 2000. An Evaluation of the L os Angeles County Juvenile Drug Treatment Boot Camp: Final Report. San Marcos, CA: California State University.