Classification of North Dakota maize inbred lines into heterotic groups based on molecular and testcross data

Euphytica

Volumn 151, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 339-349

  Barata, C ^a   Carena, M J ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Heterotic groups; Inbreds; Maize; SSR; Testers

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33750598647     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: 15735060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-006-9155-y     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bernardo R (2002) Breeding for quantitative traits in plants. Stemma Press, Woodbury, MN
2. Bernardo RJ, Romero-Severson J, Ziegle J, Hauser J, Joe L, Hookstra G, Doerge RW (2000) Parental contribution and coefficient of co-ancestry among maize inbreds: pedigree, RFLP, and SSR data. Theor Appl Genet 100:552-556
3. Carena MJ (2005) Maize commercial hybrids compared to improved population hybrids for grain yield and agronomic performance. Euphytica 141:201-208
4. Carena MJ, Hallauer AR (2001) Expression of heterosis in Leaming and Midland Corn Belt dent populations. Jour Iowa Acad Sci 108:73-78
5. Carena MJ, Wanner DW (2003) Registration of ND2000 inbred line of maize. Crop Sci 43:1568-1569
6. Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1948) The components of genetic variance in populations of bi-parental progenies and their use in estimating the average degree of dominance. Biometrics 4:254-266
7. Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297-302
8. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Longman Group, Ltd., Essex, England
9. Fulton TM, Chunwongse J, Tanksley SD (1995) Micropep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol Bio Rep 13:207-209
10. Gethi JG, Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Smith ME, Kresovich S (2002) SSR variation in important U.S. maize inbred lines. Crop Sci 42:951-957
11. Godshalk EB, Lee M, Lamkey KR (1990) Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to single cross hybrid performance of maize. Theor Appl Genet 80:273-280
12. Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combing ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463-493
13. Hallauer AR (1999) Temperate maize and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (ed.) the genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA & SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 353-361
14. Hallauer AR, Russel WA, Lamkey KR (1988) Corn breeding. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW (ed.) Corn and corn improvement, 3rd ed. Agron. Monogr. 18. ASA, CSSA & SSSA, Madison, WI
15. Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding (2nd ed.) Iowa state university press, Ames, IA
16. Hoisington D, Khairallah M, Reeves T, Ribaut JM, Skovmand B, Taba S, Warburton M (1999) Plant genetic resources: What can they contribute toward increase in crop productivity? Proc. Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5937-5943
17. Jaccard P (1908) Nouvelles researches sur la distribuition florale. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Natl 44:223-270
18. Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Sullivan H, Smith JSC (2003) Molecular and historical aspects of corn belt dent diversity. Crop Sci 43:80-91
19. Liu K, Goodman MM, Muse S, Smith JSC, Buckler E, Doebley J (2003) Genetic structure and diversity among maize inbred lines as inferred from DNA microsatellites. Genetics 165:2117-2128
20. Lu H, Bernardo R (2001) Molecular marker diversity among current and historical maize inbreds. Theor Appl Genet 103:613-617
21. Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (ed) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA & SSSA, Madison, WI
22. Moll RH, Lonnquist JH, Velez Fortuno J, Johnson C (1965) The relationship of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52:139-144
23. Mumm RH, Dudley JW (1994) A classification of 148 U.S. maize inbreds: I. Cluster analysis based on RFLPs. Crop Sci 37:617-624
24. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, NY
25. Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model of studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269-5273
26. Olson PJ, Walster HL, Hopper TH (1927) Corn for North Dakota. ND Agr Exp Stn Bull 207
27. Pejic I, Ajmone-Marsan P, Morgante M, Kozumplick V, Castiglioni P, Taramino G, Motto M (1998) Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs and AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 97:1248-1255
28. Richey FD (1931) Experiments on hybrid vigor and convergent improvement in corn. USDA Tec Bull 267
29. Rohlf FJ (1998) Numerical and multivariate analysis system (NTSYSpc version 2.0). Dep. of ecology and evolution, state univ. of New York, Stony Brook, NY
30. Romero-Severson J, Smith JSC, Ziegle J, Hauser J, Joe L, Hookstra G (2001) Pedigree analysis and haplotype sharing within diverse groups of Zea mays L. inbreds. Theor Appl Genet 103:567-574
31. SAS (1989) SAS/STAT User's Guide. (4th ed). SAS Inst., Cary, NC
32. Senior ML, Murphy JP, Goodman MM, Stuber CW (1998) Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationship in maize using agarose gel system. Crop Sci 38:1088-1098
33. Smith JSC, Chin ECL, Shu H, Smith OS, Wall SJ, Senior ML, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Ziegle J (1997) An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet 95:163-173
34. Sprague GF, Tatum LA (1941) General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J Am Soc Agron 34:923-932
35. Tautz D (1989) Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source of polymorphic DNA markers. Nuclei Acid Res 17:6463-6471
36. Tivang JG, Nienhuis J, Smith OS (1994) Estimation of sampling variance of molecular-marker data using bootstrap procedure. Theor Appl Genet 89:259-264
37. Troyer AF (1999) Background of U.S. hybrid corn. Crop Sci 39:601-626
38. Troyer AF (2004) Background of U.S. hybrid corn II: breeding, climate, and food. Crop Sci 44:370-380
39. Wang D, Shi J, Carlson SR, Cregan PB, Ward RW, Diers BW (2003) A low-cost, high-throughput polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis system for genotyping with microsatellite DNA markers. Crop Sci 43:1828-1832
40. Warburton ML, Xianchun X, Crossa J, Franco J, Melchinger AE, Frisch M, Bohn M, Hoisington D (2002) Genetic characterization of CIMMYT inbred lines and open pollinated populations using large scale fingerprinting methods. Crop. Sci 42:1832-1840
41. Yu J, Lu H, Bernardo R (2001) Inconsistency between SSR groupings and genetic background of white corn inbreds. Maydica 46:133-139