In the aftermath of Chaoulli v. Quebec: Whose opinion prevailed?

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 175, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1051-1052

  Quesnel Vallée, Amélie ^a   Bourque, Méianie ^b   Fedick, Cara ^c   Maioni, Antonia ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANADA; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; POLICY; PREVALENCE; PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 33750593875     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060600     Document Type: Short Survey

References (3)

1. Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General). 2005 SCC 35.
2. Krewski D. Public perception and acceptable levels of health risk among Canadians. Ottawa: Health Canada's Health Policy Research Program; 2005.
3. Garantir l'accès: un déS d'équité, d'efficience et de qualité. Sainte-Foy (QC): Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux; 2006.