The impact on relative risk estimates of inconsistencies between ICD-9 and ICD-10

Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 63, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 734-740

  Richardson, D B ^a  

^a IL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEATH CERTIFICATE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FATALITY; FOLLOW UP; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR;

CAUSE OF DEATH; COHORT STUDIES; DEATH CERTIFICATES; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; RISK; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33750589502     PISSN: 13510711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/oem.2006.027243     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Israel RA, Rosenberg HM, Curtin LR. Analytical potential For multiple cause of death data. Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:161-79.
2. Anderson RN, Minino AM, Hoyert DL, et al. Comparability of cause of death between ICD-9 and ICD-10: preliminary estimates. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2001;49:1-32.
3. Hetzel AM. History and organization of the vital statistics system. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 1997.
4. Steenland K, Beaumont J, Spaeth S, et al. New developments in the Life Table Analysis System of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Journal of Occupational Medicine 1990;32:1091-8.
5. Marsh GM, Youk AO, Stone RA, et al. OCMAP-PLUS: a program for the comprehensive analysis of occupational cohort data. J Occup Environ Med 1998;40:351-62.
6. Steenland K, Nowlin S, Ryan B, et al. Use of multiple-cause mortality data in epidemiologic analyses: US rate and proportion files developed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the National Cancer Institute. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:855-62.