Herbst treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in retrognathic and prognathic facial types: A cephalometric long-term retrospective study

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 930-941

  Bock, Niko ^a   Pancherz, Hans ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Facial type; Herbst; Prognathic; Retrognathic

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750584570     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/100605-352     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:104-113.
2. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:466-502.
3. Hasund A. Klinische Kephalometrie für die Bergen-Technik [in German]. Bergen, Norwegen:Kieferorthopädische Abteilung des zahnärztlichen Instituts der Universität; 1973;51-58, 63-67.
4. Janson I. Bionator-Modifikationen in der Kieferorthopädischen Therapie [in German]. München: Hanser Verlag; 1987;23-56.
5. Zaher AR, Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Posttreatment changes in different facial types. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:425-436.
6. Ruf S, Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:271-276.
7. Pancherz H, Michailidou C. Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;126:53-161.
8. Herbst E. Atlas und Grundriss der Zahnärztlichen Orthopädie [in German]. München:JF Lehmann's Verlag; 1910;311-315.
9. Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics. Chicago, IL:Year Book Medical Publishers; 1973;292.
10. Hägg U, Taranger J. Skeletal stages of the hand wrist as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontol Scand. 1980;38:187-200.
11. Pancherz H, Hägg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:273-287.
12. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG. Dentofacial Orthopedics with Functional Appliances, 2nd ed. St Louis, MO:Mosby; 1997;336-366.
13. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8:215-228.
14. Pancherz H. The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1991;100:220-233.
15. Pancherz H, Fackel U. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre-and post- dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12:209-218.
16. Pancherz H, Fischer S. Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:493-501.