Weak formulation of boundary conditions for scalar conservation laws: An application to highway traffic modelling

International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control

Volumn 16, Issue 16, 2006, Pages 733-748

  Strub, Issam S ^a   Bayen, Alexandre M ^a  

^a Berkeley   (United States)

Author keywords

Boundary control; Highway traffic modelling; LWR PDE; Weak solution of scalar conservation laws

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

BOUNDARY CONTROL; HIGHWAY TRAFFIC MODELING; LWR PDE; SCALAR CONSERVATION LAWS;

HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 33750582904     PISSN: 10498923     EISSN: 10991239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.1099     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Sun X, Horowitz R. Localized switching rampmetering controller with queue length regulator for congested freeways. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Portland, June 2005; 2141-2146.
2. Lighthill MJ, Whitham GB. On kinematic waves. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 1956; 229(1178):317-345.
3. Richards PI. Shock waves on the highway. Operations Research 1956; 4(1):42-51.
4. Petit N. Systèmes à retard. Platitude en génie des procédés et contrôle de certaines équations des ondes. Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, 2000.
5. Krstić M. On global stabilization of Burgers' equation by boundary control. Systems and Control Letters 1999; 37:123-142.
6. Oleinik OA. On discontinuous solutions of nonlinear differential equations. Uspekhi Matematichiskish Nauk 1957; 12:3-73.
7. (English translation: American Mathematical Society 1963; 26(2):95-172.)
8. Ansorge R. What does the entropy condition mean in traffic flow theory? Transportation Research 1990; 24B(2): 133-143.
9. Daganzo C. The cell transmission model, part II: network traffic. Transportation Research 1995; 29B(2):79-93.
10. Bardos C, Le Roux AY, Nedelec JC. First order quasilinear equations with boundary conditions. Communications in Partial Differential Equations 1979; 4(9):1017-1034.
11. Berkeley Highway Laboratory. http://bhl.its.berkeley.edu:9006/bhl/index. html
12. Godunov SK. A difference method for numerical calculation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of hydrodynamics. Mathematics of the Sbornik 1959; 47:271-306.
13. Jameson A. Analysis and design of numerical schemes for gas dynamics 1: artificial diffusion, upwind biasing, limiters and their effect on accuracy and multigrid convergence. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 1995; 4:171-218.
14. Jameson A. Analysis and design of numerical schemes for gas dynamics 2: artificial diffusion and discrete shock structure. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 1995; 4:1-38.
15. Daganzo C. The cell transmission model: a dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory. Transportation Research 1994; 28B(4):269-287.
16. Greenshields BD. A study of traffic capacity. Proceedings of the Highway Research Board 1935; 14:448-477.
17. Bressan A. Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws: The One Dimensional Cauchy Problem. Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 20. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2000.
18. Evans LC. Partial Differential Equations. American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, 1998.
19. Serre D. Systems of Conservation Laws. Volume 1: Hyperbolicity, Entropies, Shock Waves. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1999.
20. Ambrosio L, Fusco N, Pallara D. Functions of Bounded Variation and Free Discontinuity Problems. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press: New York, 2000.
21. Vol'pert AI. The spaces BV and quasilinear equations. Mathematics of The USSR Sbornik 1967; 2:225-267.
22. Evans LC, Gariepy RF. Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1991.
23. Greenberg H. An analysis of traffic flow. Operation Research 1959; 7(1):79-85.
24. Le Floch P. Explicit formula for scalar non-linear conservation laws with boundary condition. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 1988; 10:265-287.
25. Kruz̀kov SN. First order quasilinear equations in several independent variables. Mathematics of The USSR Sbornik 1970; 10:217-243.
26. Keyfitz BL. Solutions with shocks. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 1971; 24:125-132.
27. Otto F. Initial-boundary value problem for a scalar conservation law. Comptes Rendus de l' Academie des Sciences Serie I-Mathematique 1996; 322(8):792-734.
28. Schonbek ME. Existence of solutions to singular conservation laws. Journal of Mathematical Analysis 1984; 15(6):1125-1139.
29. LeVeque RJ. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2002.
30. Gomes GC. Optimization and microsimulation of on-ramp metering for congested freeways. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2004.
31. Ancona F, Marson A. On the attainable set for scalar nonlinear conservations laws with boundary control. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 1998; 36(1):290-312.
32. Ancona F, Marson A. Scalar non-linear conservations laws with integrable boundary data. Nonlinear Analysis 1999; 35:687-710.
33. Dafermos C. Generalized characteristics and the structure of solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws. Indiana Mathematics Journal 1977; 26:1097-1119.
34. Dafermos C. Hyberbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenchaften, vol. 325. Springer: Berlin, 2000.
35. Lax PD. Functional Analysis. Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2002.
36. Terracina A. Comparison properties for scalar conservation laws with boundary conditions. Nonlinear Analysis - Theory, Methods and Applications 1997; 28:633-653.
37. Crandall MG, Evans LC, Lions P-L. Some properties of viscosity solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Transactions on American Mathematical Society 1984; 283(2):487-502.
38. Crandall MG. Viscosity solutions: a primer. Viscosity Solutions and Applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1660. Springer: Berlin, 1997; 1-43.
39. Atwell JA, Borggaard JT, King BB. Reduced order controllers for Burgers' equation with a nonlinear observer. Applied Mathematics and Computational Science 2001; 11(6): 1311-1330.
40. Baker J, Armaou A, Christofides PD. Nonlinear control of incompressible fluid flow: application to Burgers' equation and 2d channel flow. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2000; 252:230-255.
41. 1 stability, well posedness, and simulation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2000; 6:189-200.
42. Byrnes CI, Gilliam DS, Shubov VI. Semiglobal stabilization of a boundary controlled viscous Burgers' equation. Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Phoenix, AZ, December 1999; 680-681.
43. Gazis DC. Traffic Theory. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Kluwer Academic: Boston, 2002.
44. Joseph K.T, Veerappa Gowda GD. Explicit formula for the solution of convex conservation laws with boundary condition. Duke Mathematical Journal 1991; 62(2):401-416.
45. Kobayashi T. Adaptive regulator design of a viscous Burgers' system by boundary control. IM A Journal of Mathematical Control and Information 2001; 18(3):427-437.
46. Le Roux AY. On the convergence of the Godunov's scheme for first order quasi linear equations. Proceedings of the Japan Academics 1976; 52:488-491.
47. Le Roux AY. Vanishing viscosity method for a quasilinear first order equation with boundary conditions. Conference on the Numerical Analysis of Singular Perturbation Problems, Nijnegen, 1978.
48. Ly H, Mease KD, Titi ES. Distributed and boundary control of the viscous Burgers' equation. Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization 1997; 18(1-2):143-188.
49. Önder M, Özbay E. Low dimensional modelling and Dirichlet boundary controller design for Burgers' equation. International Journal of Control 2004; 77(10):895-906.