Theoretical lower error bound for comparative evaluation of sensor arrays in magnetostatic linear inverse problems

IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

Volumn 42, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 3669-3673

  Di Rienzo, Luca ^a   Haueisen, Jens ^b,c  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b ILMENAU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Boundary element method; Error analysis; Inverse problems; Magnetostatics; Multisensor systems

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; COMPUTATION THEORY; ERROR ANALYSIS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SENSOR DATA FUSION;

DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; KERNEL MATRIX; SENSOR ARRAYS;

MAGNETOSTATICS;

EID: 33750580133     PISSN: 00189464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2006.882338     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. H. Brauer, M. Ziolkowski, M. Kuilekov, S. Men, and C. Resagk, "Surface current reconstruction using magnetic field tomography," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 1398-1401, Mar. 2004.
2. P. Bruzzone, A. Formisano, and R. Martone, "Optimal magnetic probes location for current reconstruction in multistrands superconducting cables," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1057-1060, Mar. 2002.
3. F. Bellina, P. Bettini, and F. Trevisan, "Optimization analysis of the magnetic measurements on multistrand SC cables," IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1651-1654, Mar. 2002.
4. J. Haueisen, R. Unger, T. Beuker, and M. E. Bellemann, "Evaluation of inverse algorithms in the analysis of magnetic flux leakage data," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1481-1488, May 2002.
5. R. Scorretti, R. Takahashi, L. Nicolas, and N. Burais, "Optimal characterization of LF magnetic field using multipoles," COMPEL-Int. J. Comput. Math. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1053-1061, 2004.
6. L. Rouve, L. Schmerber, O. Chadebec, and A. Foggia, "Optimal magnetic sensor location for spherical harmonics identification applied to radiated electrical devices," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1167-1170, Apr. 2006.
7. O. Chadebec, J. Coulomb, G. Cauffet, J. Bongiraud, and P. Le Thiec, "Recent improvements for solving inverse magnetostatic problem applied to thin shells," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1005-1008, Mar. 2002.
8. C. M. Arturi, L. Di Rienzo, and J. Haueisen, "Information content in single- component versus three-component cardiomagnetic fields," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 631-634, Mar. 2004.
9. L. Di Rienzo, J. Haueisen, and C. M. Arturi, "Three component magnetic field data: Impact on minimum norm solutions in a biomedical application," COMPEL-Int. J. Comput. Math. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 869-881, 2005.
10. C. R. Vogel, Computational Methods for Inverse Problems. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 2002.
11. P. C. Hansen, Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1998.
12. N. Ahmed and K. R. Rao, Orthogonal Transforms for Digital Signal Processing. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1975.
13. Y. S. Shim and Z. H. Cho, "SVD pseudoinversion image reconstruction," IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 904-909, Aug. 1981.
14. B. J. Sullivan and B. Liu, "On the use of singular value decomposition and decimation in discrete-time band-limited signal extrapolation," IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., vol. 32, no. 4, Aug. 1984.
15. S. Begot, E. Voisin, P. Hiebel, E. Artioukhine, and J. M. Kauffmann, "D-optimal experimental design applied to a linear magnetostatic inverse problem," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1065-1068, Mar. 2002.
16. J. Haueisen, J. Schreiber, H. Brauer, and T. R. Knösche, "The dependence of the inverse solution accuracy in magnetocardiography on the boundary element discretization," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1045-1048, Mar. 2002.