Bone marrow edema in osteoporotic vertebral compression percutaneous vertebroplasty and relation with clinical outcome

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 983-988

  Voormolen, Maurits H J ^a   Van Rooij, W J ^a   Van Der Graaf, Y ^b   Lohle, P N M ^a   Lampmann, L E H ^a   Juttmann, J R ^a   Sluzewski, M ^a  

^a CPRLab   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; PARACETAMOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW DISEASE; BONE MARROW EDEMA; COMPRESSION FRACTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRA FRACTURE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; EDEMA; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; SPINE FRACTURE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE MARROW DISEASES; EDEMA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRACTURES, COMPRESSION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FRACTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33750579822     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Do HM. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients for percutaneous vertebroplasty. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:235-44
2. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuyk C, et al. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1137-48
3. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974;2:1127-31
4. Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: technique, indications and results. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36:533-46
5. Martin JB, Jean B, Sugiu K, et al. Vertebroplasty: clinical experience and follow-up results. Bone 1999;25:11S-15S
6. Zoarski GH, Snow P, Olan WJ, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: quantitative prospective evaluation of long-term outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13:139-48
7. Hendrikse CA, Kalmijn S, Voormolen MH, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: review of the literature (article in Dutch). Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2003;147:1553-59
8. McGraw JK, Cardella J, Barr JD, et al. SIR Standards of Practice Committee. Society of Interventional Radiology quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:827-31
9. Do HM, Kim BS, Marcellus ML, et al. Prospective analysis of clinical outcomes after percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1623-28
10. Trout AT, Gray LA, Kallmes DF. Vertebroplasty in the inpatient population. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1629-33
11. Baker LL, Goodman SB, Perkash I, et al. Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging. Radiology 1996;199:541-49
12. Matin P. The appearance of bone scans following fractures, including immediate and log-term studies. J Nucl Med 1979;20:1227-31
13. Maynard AS, Jensen ME, Schweickert PA, et al. Value of bone scan imaging in predicting pain relief from percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1807-12
14. Dansie DM, Luetmer PH, Lane JI, et al. MRI findings after successful vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1595-600
15. Deramond H, Wright NT, Belkoff SM. Temperature elevation caused by bone cement polymerization during vertebroplasty. Bone 1999;25 Suppl:17S-21S
16. Verlaan JJ, Oner FC, Verbout AJ, et al. Temperature elevation after vertebroplasty with polymethyl-methacrylate in goat spine. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003;67:581-85