CT ratios: Parameter estimates are inconsistent with SURUSS publications? [3]

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 991-992

  Wright, Dave ^a   Bradbury, Ian ^b   Benn, Peter ^c   Nix, Barry ^d   Spencer, Kevin ^e   Cuckle, Howard ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^d CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e HAROLD WOOD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOWN SYNDROME; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING;

DOWN SYNDROME; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, FIRST; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 33750572123     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1548     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM. 1979. Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press: London.
2. Wald NJ, Bestwick JP, Morris JK. 2006a. Cross trimester marker ratios in prenatal screening for Down's Syndrome. Prenat Diag 26: 514-523.
3. Wald NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AK, et al. 2006b. Correction to the SURUSS Report. J Med Screen 13: 51-52.
4. Wright DE, Bradbury I. 2005. Repeated measures screening for Down's Syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 112: 80-83.