Using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography for assessment of aortic valve area in aortic valve stenosis

Herz

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 650-657

  Malyar, Nasser M ^a   Schlosser, Thomas ^a   Buck, Thomas ^a   Erbel, Raimund ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aortic valve area; Aortic valve stenosis; Cardiac catheterization; CMR imaging; Transesophageal echocardiography; Transthoracic echocardiography

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REVIEW; SOCIOECONOMICS; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CALCINOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 33750571678     PISSN: 03409937     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00059-006-2907-6     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Lindroos M, Kupari M, Heikkila J, et al. Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:1220-5.
2. Selzer A. Changing aspects of the natural history of valvular aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 1987;317:91-8.
3. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:630-4.
4. Zhang Y, Myhre E, Nitter-Hauge S. Noninvasive quantification of the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography. Eur Heart J 1985;6:992-8.
5. Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L, Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1985;72:810-8.
6. Tardif JC, Rodrigues AG, Hardy JF, et al. Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1296-302.
7. Hoffmann R, Flachskampf FA, Hanrath P. Planimetry of orifice area in aortic stenosis using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:529-34.
8. Gorlin R, Gorlin SG. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and centra I circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J 1951;41:1-29.
9. Burwash IG, Thomas DD, Sadahiro M, et al. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1994;89:827-35.
10. Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M, et al. Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet 2003;361:1241-6.
11. Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease). J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:672-707.
12. Schmalz A, Erbel R, Wittlich N, et al. [Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography.] Z Kardiol 1992;81:619-26.
13. Daniel WG, Erbel R, Kasper W, et al. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A multicenter survey of 10,419 examinations. Circulation 1991;83:817-21.
14. Kallmeyer IJ, Collard CD, Fox JA, et al. The safety of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography: a case series of 7200 cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1126-30.
15. John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR, et al. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:519-26.
16. Ahmed S, Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance imaging safety: implications for cardiovascular patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001;3:171-82.
17. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, et al. MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology 2001;219:264-9.
18. Thiele H, Nagel E, Paetsch I, et al. Functional cardiac MR imaging with steady-state free precession (SSFP) significantly improves endocardial border delineation without contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:362-7.
19. Allison JD, Flickinger FW, Wright JC, et al. Measurement of left ventricular mass in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using MRI: comparison with echocardiography. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;11:329-34.
20. Bellenger NG, Francis JM, Davies CL, et al. Establishment and performance of a magnetic resonance cardiac function clinic. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000;2:15-22.
21. Longmore DB, Klipstein RH, Underwood SR, et al. Dimensional accuracy of magnetic resonance in studies of the heart. Lancet 1985;1:1360-2.
22. Mogelvang J, Stokholm KH, Saunamaki K, et al. Assessment of left ventricular volumes by magnetic resonance in comparison with radionuclide angiography, contrast angiographyand echocardiography. Eur Heart J 1992;13:1677-83.
23. Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J, Poetsch T, et al. Quantification of valvular aortic Stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 2002;144:329-34.
24. Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, et al. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 2004;90:893-901.
25. Debl K, Djavidani B, Seitz J, et al. Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005;40:631-6.
26. Malyar NM, Schlosser T, Barkhausen J, et al. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography. Cardiology 2006:in press.
27. Garcia D, Pibarot P, Landry C, et al. Estimation of aortic valve effective orifice area by Doppler echocardiography: effects of valve inflow shape and flow rate. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004;17:756-65.
28. Arsenault M, Masani N, Magni G, et al. Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry: comparison with traditional Doppler data. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1931-7.
29. Beauchesne LM, deKemp R, Chan KL, et al. Temporal variations in effective orifice area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003;16:958-64.
30. Cannon SR, Richards KL, Crawford M. Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula. Circulation 1985;71:1170-8.
31. Van Grondelle A, Ditchey RV, Groves BM, et al. Thermodilution method overestimates low cardiac output in humans. Am J Physiol 1983;245:H690-2.