An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 733-737

  Erneklint, Christian ^a,c   Ödman, Per ^a   Örtengren, Ulf ^a   Karlsson, Stig ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b Nordisk Institutt for Odontologiske Materialer   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dental implant failures; Dental implants; Implant abutments; Implant loading

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; GOLD ALLOY; TITANIUM; TITANIUM ALLOY (TIAL6V4);

ARTICLE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GOLD ALLOYS; MATERIALS TESTING; TITANIUM;

EID: 33750570497     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Brägger US, Aeschlimann, Burgin W, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:26-34.
2. Balshi TJ. An analysis and management of fractured implants: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:660-666.
3. Sahin S, Cehreli, MC, Yalcin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses-A review. J Dent 2002;30:271-282.
4. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(suppl 3):197-212.
5. Boggan RS, Strong JT, Misch CE, Bidez MW. Influence of hex geometry and retaining table width on static and fatigue strength of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:436-440.
6. Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: Current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:15-46.
7. Möllersten LP, Lockowandt P, Lindén LA. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: An in vitro test. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:582-591.
8. Binon PP. Implants and components: Entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:76-94.
9. Alkan I, Sertgoz A, Ekici B. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:319-325.
10. Renouard F, Rangert B. Risk factors in Implant Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1999.
11. Taylor TD, Agar JR. Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:89-95.
12. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of a 1-piece and 2-piece conical abutment joint in implant design. Clin Oral Implant Res 2000;11:458-464.
13. Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of the internal conical interface of two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:159-166.
14. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:290-298.
15. Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:169-178.
16. Hansson S. Towards An Optimized Dental Implant and Implant Bridge Design. Paper A-Some Steps to Improve the Capacity of Dental Implants to Resist Axial Loads [thesis]. Biomechanics, Department of polymeric materials. Göteborg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology, 1997.
17. Hansson S. Implant-abutment interface: Biomechanical study of flat top versus conical. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:33-41.
18. Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: An 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:519-526.
19. Erneklint C, Odman P, Örtengren U, Rasmusson L. Tolerance test of five different types of crowns on single-tooth implants. Ilnt J Prosthodont 1998;3:233-239.
20. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:99-119.
21. Flöystrand F, Kleven E, Öilo G. A novel miniature bite force recorder and its clinical application. Acta Odontol Scand 1982;4:209-214.
22. McGlumphy EA, Robinson DM, Mendel DA. Implant super-structures: A comparison of ultimate failure force. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;1:35-39.
23. Weinberg LA. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:19-31.
24. Weinberg LA, Kruger B. A comparison of implant/prosthesis loading with four variables. Int J Prosthodont 1995;5:421-433.
25. Tortopidis D, Lyons MF, Baxendale RH, Gilmour WH. The variability of bite force measurement between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:681-686.
26. Tortopidis D, Lyons MF, Baxendale RH. Acoustic myography, electromyography and bite force in the masseter muscle. J Oral Rehabil 1998;12:940-945.
27. Mörneburg T, Pröschel PA. Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads: A methodologic clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:20-27.
28. Binon P. The role of screws in implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9(suppl 1):48-63.
29. Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP. Elongation and pre-load stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:529-536.
30. Al Rafee MA, Nagy WW, Fournelle RA, Dhuru VB, Tzenakis GK, Pechous CE. The effect of repeated torque on the ultimate tensile strength of slotted gold retaining screws. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:176-182.
31. Weinberg LA, Kruger B. Biomechanical considerations when combining tooth-supported and implant-supported prostheses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:22-27.
32. Brägger U, Hafeli U, Huber B, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Evaluation of postsurgical crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:218-224.
33. Norton MR. In vitro evaluation of the strength of the conical implant-to-abutment joint in two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:567-571.
34. Jaarda MJ, Razzoog ME, Gratton DG. Geometric comparison of five interchangeable implant retaining screws. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:373-379.
35. Hansson S. A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone. An axisymmetric finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;3:286-293.
36. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;3:121-132.
37. Worthington P, Lang BR, LaVelle WE. Osseointegration in Dentistry: An Introduction, ed 2. Chicago: Quintessence, 2003:90-93.
38. Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Cal E, Ow RK. Analysis of incidence and associated factors with fractured implants: A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:662-667.
39. Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB, Carr AB, Naert I, Wennerberg A. Quality of dental implants. Int Dent J 2003;53(suppl 2):409-443.
40. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater 1992;10:153-201.