The chronic disease self-management program: Extending reach through the internet

Medical Care

Volumn 44, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 961-963

  Gerber, Ben S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^b Institute for Health Research and Policy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EDITORIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MOTIVATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESEARCH; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIOECONOMICS; TIME; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CHRONIC DISEASE; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MOTIVATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH; SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33750558531     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000244923.80923.1e     Document Type: Editorial

References (21)

1. Partnership for Solutions, A Project of the Johns Hopkins University and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Chronic Conditions: Making the Case for Ongoing Care. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University; 2002.
2. Fried LP, Guralnik JM. Disability in older adults: evidence regarding significance, etiology, and risk. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1887;45:92-100.
3. Lorig K. Self-management education: more than a nice extra. Med Care. 2003;41:699-701.
4. Brownson RC, Bright FS. Chronic disease control in public health practice: looking back and moving forward. Public Health Rep. 2004;119:230-238.
5. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322-1327.
6. Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, et al. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns. 2001;44:119-127.
7. Murray E, Burns J, See TS, et al. Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD004274.
8. Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, et al. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care. 2006;44:964-971.
9. Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, et al. Why are health care interventions delivered over the Internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8:e10.
10. Smith L, Weinert C. Telecommunication support for rural women with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2000;26:645-655.
11. Hill W, Weinert C, Cudney S. Influence of a computer intervention on the psychological status of chronically ill rural women: preliminary results. Nurs Res. 2006;55:34-42.
12. Walther JB, Pingree S, Hawkins RP, et al. Attributes of interactive online health information systems. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e33.
13. Lorig KR, Hurwicz ML, Sobel D, et al. A national dissemination of an evidence-based self-management program: a process evaluation study. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;59:69-79.
14. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e11.
15. Gustafson DH, McTavish FM, Stengle W, et al. Use and Impact of eHealth System by Low-income Women With Breast Cancer. J Health Commun. 2005;10(Suppl 1):195-218.
16. Gustafson DH, McTavish FM, Stengle W, et al. Reducing the digital divide for low-income women with breast cancer: a feasibility study of a population-based intervention. J Health Commun. 2005;10(Suppl 1):173-193.
17. Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, et al. Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:435-445.
18. Kaufman DR, Patel VL, Hilliman C, et al. Usability in the real world: assessing medical information technologies in patients' homes. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36:45-60.
19. Cashen MS, Dykes P, Gerber B. eHealth technology and Internet resources: barriers for vulnerable populations. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19:209-14; quiz 15-6.
20. Gerber BS, Brodsky IG, Lawless KA, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a low-literacy diabetes education computer multimedia application. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1574-1580.
21. Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, et al. CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. Int J Med Inform. 2002;65:169-177.