Risk, finance and North Carolina's post-industrial future

Southeastern Geographer

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 245-258

  Graves, William ^a,b   Woodey, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Culture; Economic development; Finance; Innovation; Venture capital

Indexed keywords

CAPITAL; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN CAPITAL; INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT; INNOVATION;

NORTH AMERICA; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33750555974     PISSN: 0038366X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/sgo.2006.0025     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Atkinson, R., and P. Gottlieb. 2001. The metropolitan new economy index. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
2. Carlton, D., and P. Coclanis. 1989. Capital mobilization and southern industry, 1880-1905: The case of the Carolina Piedmont. Journal of Economic History 49:73-94.
3. Carlton, D. 1990. The revolution from above: The national market and the beginnings of industrialization in North Carolina. The Journal American History 77(2):445-475.
4. Clark, J. 2005. Personal Communication. 28 October.
5. Cobb, J. 1984. Industrialization and southern society. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
6. Cobb, J. 1999. The selling of the South: The southern crusade for industrial development 1936-1990. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
7. Erickson, R.A. 1976. The filtering down process: Industrial location in an non metropolitan area. Professional Geographer 28:254-260.
8. Fama, E.F. 1991. Efficient capital markets: II. Journal of Finance XLVI:1575-1617.
9. Feldman, M.P., and R. Florida. 1994. The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84:210-229.
10. Florida, R., and D.F. Smith. 1993. Venture capital formation, investment, and regional industrialization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83:434-451
11. Gompers, P., and J. Lerner. 2004. The venture capital cycle. Second Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Goldstein, H., and E. Malizia. 1985. Microelectronics and economic development in North Carolina. In High hopes for high-tech, ed. D. Whittington, 225-255. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
13. Graves, W. 2001. Charlotte's role as a financial center: Looking beyond bank assets. Southeastern Geographer 41:230-245.
14. Graves, W. 2003. Financing flexibility in a global market: The metropolitan distribution of equity investment. Urban Geography 24(7):611-635.
15. Graves, W., and H. Campbell. 2001. Paying for the New Economy: The Geography of Equity Finance in North Carolina. The North Carolina Geographer 9:24-41.
16. Green, M. 2004. Venture capital in the United States 1995-2002. The Industrial Geographer 2(2):2-30.
17. Hardin, J., and C. Harder. 2003. Tracking innovation: North Carolina innovation index 2003. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Board of Science and Technology.
18. Johnson, M.L. 1997. To restructure or not to restructure: Contemplations on postwar industrial geography in the U.S. South. Southeastern Geographer 38:162-192.
19. Kenny, M., and Florida, R. 2000. Venture capital in Silicon Valley: Fueling new firm formation. In Understanding Silicon Valley: The anatomy of an entrepreneurial region, ed. M. Kenny, 98-124. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
20. Lee, S.Y., R. Florida, and Z. Acs. 2004. Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Studies 38(8):879-891.
21. Leinbach, T.R., and C. Amrhein. 1987. A geography of the venture capital industry in the U.S. Professional Geographer 39(2):146-158.
22. Lyson, T.A. 1989. Two sides to the sunbelt: The growing divergence between the rural and urban South. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23. Lugar, M. 1985. The states and high-technology development: The case of North Carolina. In High hopes for high-tech, ed. D. Whittington, 193-224. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
24. Lugar, M. and H. Goldstein. 1991. Technology in the garden: Research parks and regional economic development. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
25. Lundegaard, K. 1999. Research triangle firm faces quandary of its age. The Wall Street Journal 3 November.
26. Macesich, G. 1964. 'Liquidity preference' - A southern banking tradition. In Essays in southern economic development, eds. M. Greenhut and W. Whitman, 158-168. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
27. Malecki, E. 1995. Global cities and back roads: Perspectives on the southern economy. Review of Regional Studies 25:237-245.
28. Miller, M. 1998. Financial markets and economic growth. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 11:8-15.
29. Nakamura, L. 1999. Intangibles: What put the new in the new economy? Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia 4:3-16.
30. Nakamura, L. 2000. Economics and the new economy: The invisible hand meets creative destruction. Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia 5:15-30.
31. National Science Foundation. 2004. Science and engineering state profiles 2001-2003. Last accessed 8 December 2004 at http://www.nsf.gov/ statistics/nsf05301/
32. Park, S.O., and J.O. Wheeler. 1983. The filtering down process in Georgia: The third stage in the product life cycle. Professional Geographer 35:18-31.
33. Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput, J.I. Bowie, and L. Smith-Doerr. 2002. The spatial clustering of science and capital: Accounting for biotech firm - Venture capital relationships. Regional Studies 36(3):291-305.
34. Saxenien, A. 1996. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Schell, D. 1983. Entrepreneurial activity: A comparison of three North Carolina counties. In Frontiers of entrepreneurial research, eds. J. Hornaday, F. Tarpley, J. Timmons and K. Vesper, 495-518. Wellesley, MA: Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, Babson College.
36. Schell, D. 1984. The development of the venture capital industry in North Carolina: A new approach. In Frontiers of entrepreneurial research, eds. J. Hornaday, F. Tarpley, J. Timmons and K. Vesper, 55-72. Wellesley, MA: Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, Babson College.
37. Semple, K.R., and A.G. Phipps. 1982. The Spatial evolution of corporate headquarters within an urban system. Urban Geography 3:258-279.
38. Sorenson, O., and T. Stuart. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology 106(6):1546-88.
39. Southern Growth Policies Board. 1993. Measure by measure: The South will lead the nation: The final report of the 1992 commission on the future of the South. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board.
40. Whittington, D. 1985. Microelectronics policy in North Carolina: An introduction. In High hopes for high-tech, ed. D. Whittington, 3-34. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
41. Woo, L., J. Thomas, D. Buchholz, and W. Schweke. 2004. The development report card for the States. Washington, DC: Corporation for Enterprise Development.
42. Zook, M. 2002. Grounded capital: Venture financing and the geography of the internet industry, 1994-2000. Journal of Economic Geography 2:151-177.
43. Zook, M. 2004. The knowledge brokers: Venture capitalists, tacit knowledge and regional development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(3):621-41.