메뉴 건너뛰기
Psychiatric Services
Volumn 57, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1516-
Legal consequences of seclusion and restraint [11]
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COURT; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DECISION MAKING; FREEDOM; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; LETTER; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; PROFESSIONALISM; RISK FACTOR; UNITED STATES;
EID: 33750550093     PISSN: 10752730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.10.1516     Document Type: Letter
Times cited : (7)
References (5)
  • 1
    • 33645663244 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Elimination of seclusion and restraint: A reasonable goal?
    • Liberman RP: Elimination of seclusion and restraint: a reasonable goal? Psychiatric Services 57:576, 2006
    • (2006) Psychiatric Services , vol.57 , pp. 576
    • Liberman, R.P.1
  • 2
    • 33745822816 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The recovery model and seclusion and restraint
    • McLoughlin KA, Geller JL: The recovery model and seclusion and restraint. Psychiatric Services 57:1045, 2006
    • (2006) Psychiatric Services , vol.57 , pp. 1045
    • McLoughlin, K.A.1    Geller, J.L.2
  • 3
    • 33750543425 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Youngberg v Romeo, 457 US 307, 316 (1982)
    • Youngberg v Romeo, 457 US 307, 316 (1982)
  • 4
    • 0027973227 scopus 로고
    • Restraint and seclusion: A review of the literature
    • Fisher W: Restraint and seclusion: a review of the literature, American Journal of Psychiatry 151:1584-1591, 1994
    • (1994) American Journal of Psychiatry , vol.151 , pp. 1584-1591
    • Fisher, W.1
  • 5
    • 33750573589 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Davis v Rennie, 264 F3rd 86 (1st Cir 2000), cert denied, 535 US 1053 (2002)
    • Davis v Rennie, 264 F3rd 86 (1st Cir 2000), cert denied, 535 US 1053 (2002)

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.