Temperature in fermion systems and the chiral fermion determinant

Physical Review D

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2000, Pages

  Ichinose, Shoichi ^a  

^a BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750548710     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Lett. B 288, 342 (1992).
2. K. Jansen, Phys. Lett. B 288, 348 (1992).
3. C. G. Callan and J. A. Harvey, Nucl. Phys. B250, 427 (1985).
4. Y. Shamir, Nucl. Phys. B406, 90 (1993).
5. M. Creutz and I. Horvath, Phys. Rev. D 50, 2297 (1994).
6. M. Creutz, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 42, 56 (1995).
7. V. Furman and Y. Shamir, Nucl. Phys. B439, 54 (1995).
8. T. Blum and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 56, 174 (1997).
9. T. Blum and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3595 (1997).
10. R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, Nucl. Phys. B412, 574 (1994).
11. R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, Nucl. Phys. B443, 305 (1995).
12. S. Randjbar-Daemi and J. Strathdee, Nucl. Phys. B443, 386 (1995).
13. S. Randjbar-Daemi and J. Strathdee, Phys. Lett. B 348, 543 (1995).
14. S. Randjbar-Daemi and J. Strathdee, Phys. Lett. B 402, 134 (1997).
15. E. Abdalla, M. C. B. Abdalla, and K. D. Rothe, 2 Dimensional Quantum Field Theory (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
16. When we apply this formula in Eq. (2), we must pay care to zero modes of D. Generally this point is related to the fixing of local (gauge) symmetry and the regularization of the infrared behavior. In the present case, there exists no problem in this respect. See Chap. IV of Ref. [15].
17. R. P. Feynman, Statistical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, 1972).
18. S. Ichinose and N. Ikeda, J. Math. Phys. 40, 2259 (1999).
19. K. Fujikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1195 (1979);
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1733 (1980);
21. Phys. Rev. D 21, 2848 (1980);
22. Phys. Rev. D 22, 1499(E) (1980).
23. S. Ichinose and N. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5932 (1996).
24. A. M. Polyakov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2, 893 (1987).
25. a) in (1 +4)-dimensional Minkowski space.
26. Here we introduce two independent regularization parameters M and A/' in order to stress that the two domains are defined not by (the sign of) the (1+4)-dimensional fermion mass but by the relation (14). This point distinguishes the present formalism from the original overlap formalism. We will soon take M = M' for simplicity.
27. J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964);
28. Relativistic Quantum Fields (McGraw Hill, New York, 1965).
29. a).
30. μ.
31. 5 + ik.
32. 1 (circle). In the present case, however, the extra space can not be compactified since it is known, in the lattice formalism, that the fermion doubler appears in the case when the periodic boundary condition is imposed on the extra space [4].
33. μ|→ + ∞ that of the ultraviolet regularization. In the sense that both the ultraviolet and the infrared cutoffs exist, the present regularization is similar to the lattice regularization.
34. A symmetry with domain wall fermions" hep-lat/9903024.
35. 0 integral in Eq. (37), and the final anomaly result depends on it.
36. 2/M≤1. In this sense, the third stage condition (29) is used in a loosened way. We regard it as a part of regularization. The same thing can be said for the evaluation of Eq. (44).
37. K. Fujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 31, 341 (1985).
38. S. Ichinose and N. Ikeda, "Gauge Symmetry of the Heat Kernel and Anomaly Formulae" Report No. DAMTP/96-87, hep-th/9610136.