Comparison of two- vs. three-view thoracic radiographic studies on conspicuity of structured interstitial patterns in dogs

Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 542-545

  Ober, Christopher P ^a   Barber, Don ^a  

^a VIRGINIA MARYLAND REGIONAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Metastatic disease; Radiography; Thorax

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOG; DOG DISEASE; EVALUATION; INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; DOG DISEASES; DOGS; LUNG DISEASES, INTERSTITIAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 33750547794     PISSN: 10588183     EISSN: 17408261     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2006.00183.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Spencer CP, Ackerman N, Burt JK. The canine lateral thoracic radiograph. Vet Radiol 1981;22:262-266.
2. Lang J, Wortman JA, Glickman LT, Biery DN, Rhodes WH. Sensitivity of radiographic detection of lung metastasis in the dog. Vet Radiol 1986;27:74-78.
3. Pechman RD Jr. Effect of dependency vs. nondependency on lung lesion visualization. Vet Radiol 1987;28:185-190.
4. Barthez PY, Hornof WJ, Théon AP, Craychee TJ, Morgan JP. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the performance of various radiographic protocols when screening dogs for pulmonary metastases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994;204:237-240.
5. Ahlberg N-E, Hoppe F, Kelter U, Svensson L. A computed tomographic study of volume and x-ray attenuation of the lungs of beagles in various body positions. Vet Radiol 1985;26:43-47.
6. Holt D, Van Winkle T, Schelling C, Prymak C. Correlation between thoracic radiographs and postmortem findings in dogs with hemangiosarcoma: 77 cases (1984-1989). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992;200:1535-1539.
7. Ruehl WW Jr., Thrall DE. The effect of dorsal vs. ventral recumbency on the radiographic appearance of the canine thorax. Vet Radiol 1981;22:10-16.
8. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
9. Samei E, Flynn MJ, Eyler WR. Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. Radiology 1999;213:727-734.
10. Samei E, Flynn MJ, Peterson E, Eyler WR. Subtle lung nodules: influence of local anatomic variations on detection. Radiology 2003;228:76-84.
11. Woodard PK, Slone RM, Sagel SS, et al. Detection of CT-proved pulmonary nodules: comparison of selenium-based digital and conventional screen-film chest radiographs. Radiology 1998;209:705-709.
12. MacMahon H, Engelmann R, Behlen FM, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: results of a large-scale observer test. Radiology 1999;213:723-726.
13. Kakeda S, Moriya J, Sato H, et al. Improved detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs using a commercial computer-aided diagnosis system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:505-510.