Pebbles in the mainstream: How do we find them?

American Annals of the Deaf

Volumn 151, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 105-113

  Cawthon, Stephanie W ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750546030     PISSN: 0002726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/aad.2006.0024     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2004). Understanding and developing inclusive practices in schools: A collaborative action research network. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(2), 125-140.
2. Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2003) Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard to involve Internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2), 185-210.
3. Brown, H. (2004). Action research in the classroom: A process that feeds the spirit of the adolescent. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1-30.
4. Calhoun, E. F. (2002). Action research for school improvement. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 18-23.
5. Cawthon, S. (2004). Schools for the Deaf and the No Child Left Behind Act. American Annals of the Deaf, 149(4), 314-323.
6. Cawthon, S. (2005a, April). The impact of accountability reform on assessment practices for deaf and hard of hearing students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
7. Cawthon, S. (2005b, April). No Child Left Behind and Deaf Education. Paper presented at the annual Conference of Educational Administrators of Schools and Programs for the Deaf, Atlanta, GA.
8. Cawthon, S. (2006). Findings from the National Survey on Accommodations and Alternate Assessments for Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11 (3): 337-359.
9. Craig, D. V. (2004). Practitioner action research: Action research to improve practice. Work-Based Learning, in Primary Care, 2, 324-338.
10. Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Dillman, D., Tortora, R., & Bowker, D. (1998). Principles for Constructing Web Surveys. SESRC Technical Report 98-50, Washington, DC: Pullman.
12. Fryer, E. (2004). Researcher-practitioner: An unholy marriage? Educational Studies, 30(2), 175-185.
13. Gagnon, J. C., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2004). Curriculum, assessment, and accountability in day treatment and residential schools. Exceptional Children, 70, 263-283.
14. Gardner, S. (2004). Participatory action research helps now. Education Digest, 70(3), 51-56.
15. Hammersley, M. (2004). Action research: A contradiction in terms? Oxford Review of Education, 30(2), 165-181.
16. Marshall, M. (2005). Promoting school research and reflection. Education Journal, 83, 31-32.
17. Mitchell, R. (2004). National profile of deaf and hard of hearing students in special education from weighted survey results. American Annals of the Deaf, 149(4), 336-349.
18. National Center for Education Statistics (2004). Common Core of Data. Retrieved September 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/.
19. Schmoker, M. (2004). Learning communities at the crossroads: Towards the best schools we've ever had. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 84-88.
20. Schoen, S., & Nolen, J. (2004). Action research. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(1), 26-30.
21. Walden University. (2005, February). Walden Ponder.