Curriculurri-based measurement and the evaluation of reading skills of Spanish-speaking English language learners in bilingual education classrooms

School Psychology Review

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 356-369

  De Ramírez, Romilia Domínguez ^a   Shapiro, Edward S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750543546     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Baker, C. (2001). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (3rd ed.). New York: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
2. Baker, S. K., & Good, R. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second grade students. School Psychology Review, 24, 561-578.
3. Baker, S. K., Plasencia-Peinado, J., & Lezcano-Lytle, V. (1998). The use of curriculum-based measurement with language-minority students. In M. Shinn (Ed.),Advanced applications of curriculum based assessment (pp. 175-213). New York: Guilford Press.
4. Beaver, J. (1997). Developmental reading assessment resource guide. Glenview, IL: Celebration Press.
5. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
6. Crawford, A. N. (1984). A Spanish language Fry type readability procedure: Elementary level. Los Angeles: Bilingual Education Paper Series, Evaluation Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University, Los Angeles.
7. Cummins, J. (1991). Interdependence of first- and second-language proficiency in bilingual children. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 70-89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. De Johnson, T. H., O'Connell, D. C., & Sabin, E. J. (1979). Temporal analysis of English and Spanish narratives. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 347-350.
9. Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
10. Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, B. A., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98-108.
11. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 204-219.
12. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Waltz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 22-48.
13. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157-171.
14. Garcia, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1994). Assessment and diversity. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (20th éd., pp. 337-391). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
15. Grimes, J., & Kurns, S. (2003). An intervention-based system for addressing NCLB and IDEA expectations: A multiple tiered model to ensure every child learns. Paper presented at the Responsiveness to Intervention Symposium sponsored by the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities, Kansas City, MO.
16. Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., Black, C., & Blair, J. (2005). Fostering the development of reading skill through supplemental instruction: Results for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 66-85.
17. Hintze, J. M., Shapiro, E. S., Conte, K. L., & Basile, I. (1997). Oral reading fluency and authentic reading material: Criterion validity of the technical features of CBM survey-level-assessment. School Psychology Review, 26, 535-553.
18. Howe, K. B., & Shinn, M. (2001). Standard reading assessment passages (RAPs) for use in general outcome come measures: A manual describing development and technical features Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation, Inc.
19. Kovaleski, J. F. (2003). The three-tier model for identifying learning disabilities: Critical program features and system issues. Paper presented at the Responsiveness to Intervention Symposium sponsored by the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities, Kansas City, MO.
20. Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Hickman-Davis, P., & Kouzekanani, K. (2003). Effectiveness of supplemental reading instruction for second-grade English language learners with reading difficulties. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 222-238.
21. Macias, R. F. (2000). Summary report of the survey of the states' limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services, 1997-98. National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education, Washington, DC.
22. Malakoff, M., & Hakuta, K. (1991). Translation skill and metalinguistic awareness in bilinguals. In E. Bialystok (Ed), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 141-166). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
24. McCardle, P., Mele-McCarthy, J., Cutting, L., Leos, K. & D'Emilio, T. (2005). Learning disabilities in English language learners: Identifying the issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2, 1-5.
25. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110.
26. Ochoa, S. H., Powell, M. P., & Robles-Pina, R. (1996). School psychologists' assessment practices with bilingual and limited-English proficient students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 250-275.
27. Osorio-O'Dea, P. (2001). Bilingual education: An overview. CRS Report for Congress. Retrieved December 7, 2004 from http://www.policyaunanac.org/ education/archive/bilingual.pdf
28. Pena, G. B. (1980). The Fry graph applied to Spanish readability. The Reading Teacher, 33, 426-430.
29. Ramfrez, M. C. (2001). An investigation of English language learners and reading skills on reading comprehension for Spanish-speaking English language learners. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 2716.
30. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Identifying and denning academic problems: CBM screening and eligibility procedures. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 90-129). New York: Guilford Press.
31. Shinn, M. R., & Bamonto, S. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: Big ideas and avoiding confusion. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 1-31). New York: Guilford Press.
32. Shinn, M. R. Good, R. H., Knutson, N., & Tilly, D. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
33. Shinn, M. R., & Shinn, M. (2002). AIMSweb training workbook: Administration and scoring of reading curriculum-based measurement (R-CBM) for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation, Inc.
34. Speece, D. L., & Case, L. P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identify early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735-749.
35. U.S. Census Bureau, (2000). Census 2000 Summary File 3. Washington, DC: Bureau.
36. Wagner, R. K., Francis, D. J., & Morris, R. D. (2005). Identifying English language learners with learning disabilities: Key challenges and possible approaches. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 6-5.
37. Williams, E. J. (1999). Developmental reading assessment reliability study. Retrieved August 25, 2005,from http://www.pearsonlearning.com/ correlation/rsp/DRA.doc