When a native "goes researcher": Notes from the North American Indigenous games

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 450-461

  Jacob, Michelle M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Epistemology; Fieldwork methods; Indigenous peoples; Reflexivity; Subjectivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750538427     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764206294052     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brah, A. (2001). Difference, diversity, differentiation. In K.-K. Bhavnani (Ed.), Feminism and "race" (pp. 456-478). New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1996)
2. Collins, P. H. (1998). Fighting words. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3. Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4. hooks, b. (1992). Representing Whiteness in the Black imagination. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 338-346). New York: Routledge.
5. McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women's studies (Working Paper No. 189). Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College Center for Research on Women.
6. Medicine, B. (2001). Learning to be an anthropologist and remaining "Native." Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
7. Mihesuah, D. A. (1998). Natives and academics: Researching and writing about American Indians. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
8. Mihesuah, D. A., & Wilson, A. C. (2004). Introduction. In D. Mihesuah & A. C. Wilson (Eds.), Indigenizing the academy: Transforming scholarship and empowering communities (pp. 1-15). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
9. Parkhill, T. C. (1997). Weaving ourselves into the land: Charles Godfrey Leland, "Indians," and the study of Native American religion. Albany: University of New York Press.
10. Rose, W. (1984). Just what's all this fuss about White shamanism anyway? Dolphin, 9, 13-24.
11. Smith, L. T. (2001). Decolonizing methodologies. New York: Zed Books.
12. Swisher, K. G. (1998). Why Indian people should be the ones to write about Indian education. In D. A. Mihesuah (Ed.), Natives and academics: Researching and writing about American Indians (pp. 190-199). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
13. Twine, F. W. (2000). Racial ideologies and racial methodologies. In F. W. Twine & J. W. Warren (Eds.), Racing research, researching race (pp. 1-34). New York: New York University Press.
14. Twine, F. W., & Warren, J. W. (Eds.). (2000). Racing research, researching race. New York: New York University Press.
15. Veroff, J., & DiStefano, A. (2002). Introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (8). 1188-1196.
16. Williams, B. F. (1996). Skinfolk, not kinfolk: Comparative reflections on the identity of participant-observation in two field situations. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 72-95). Boulder, CO: Westview.
17. Wolf, D. L. (1996). Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. Boulder, CO: Westview.
18. Zavella, P. (1996). Feminist insider dilemmas: Constructing ethnic identity with Chicana informants. In D. L. Wolf (Ed.), Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork (pp. 138-159). Boulder, CO: Westview.
19. Zinn, M. B. (1979). Field research in minority communities: Ethical, methodological, and political observations by an insider. Social Problems, 27 (2). 209-219.