Sustainable development in regional planning: The search for new tools and renewed legitimacy

Geoforum

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 921-931

  Counsell, Dave ^a   Haughton, Graham ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

England; Governmentality; Planning; Regions; Sustainability appraisal; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; REGIONAL PLANNING; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 33750525362     PISSN: 00167185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. In: Allmendinger P., and Tewdwr-Jones M. (Eds). Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory (2002), Routledge, London
2. Ashenden S. Questions of criticism: Habermas and Foucault on civil society and resistance. In: Ashenden S., and Owen D. (Eds). Foucault Contra Habermas (1999), Sage, London 143-166
3. Baker M. Planning for the English Regions: a review of the Secretary of Stateís Regional Planning Guidance. Planning Practice and Research 13 2 (1998) 153-169
4. Baker M., Deas I., and Wong C. Obscure ritual or administrative luxury? Integrating strategic planning and regional development. Environment and Planning B: Environment and Design 26 5 (1999) 763-782
5. Benson D., and Jordan A. Sustainability appraisal in local land-use planning: patterns of current performance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47 2 (2004) 269-286
6. In: Blowers A., and Evans B. (Eds). Town Planning into the 21st Century (1997), Routledge, London
7. CAG Consultants and Land Use Consultants, 1997. Environmental capital: a new approach. A provisional guide. Report for Countryside Commission, English Heritage, English Nature, Environment Agency. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham.
8. CAG Consultants and Land Use Consultants, 2001. Quality of Life Canptial: managing environmental, social and economic benefits. Overview report. Report for Countryside Agency, English Heritage, English Nature, Environment Agency. No place of publication noted.
9. Counsell, D., Haughton, G., 2002. Sustainability appraisal regional planning guidance: final report: ODPM London. Available from: .
10. Dean M. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (1999), Sage, London
11. DETR. Regional Development Agencies' Regional Strategies (1998), The Stationary Office, London
12. DETR. A Better Quality of Life. A Strategy for Sustainable Development for the UK (1999), The Stationary Office, London
13. DETR. PPG11 Regional Planning DETR (2000), HMSO, London
14. DETR. Good Practice Guide on Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Planning Guidance (2000), HMSO, London
15. DETR. Guidance on Preparing Regional Sustainable Development Frameworks (2000), DETR, London
16. Foucault M. Governmentality. In: Burchell G., Gordon C., and Miller P. (Eds). The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality (1991), Harvester Wheatsheaf, London 87-104
17. Gillespie, J., Shepherd, P., 1995. 'Establishing criteria for identifying critical natural capital in the terrestial environment'. English Nature Research Report, 141. English Nature, Peterborough.
18. Hamblin P. What's the damage?. The Guardian, Guardian Society (2004) 12-13
19. Haughton G., and Counsell D. Regions and sustainable development: regional planning matters. Geographical Journal 170 2 (2004) 135-145
20. Haughton G., and Counsell D. Regions, Spatial Strategies and Sustainable Development (2004), Routledge, London
21. Healey P., and Shaw T. Changing meanings of environment in the British planning system. Transactions IBG 19 4 (1994) 420-437
22. Jacobs M. Making Sense of Environmental Capacity (1997), CPRE, London
23. Jessop B. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place (1990), Polity, Cambridge
24. Kitchen T. Consultation on government policy initiatives: the case of Regional Planning Guidance. Planning Practice and Research 14 1 (1999) 5-15
25. Murdoch J. Space against time: competing rationalities in planning for housing. Transactions IBG 25 (2000) 503-519
26. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Spatial Strategies and Local Development Frameworks: consultation paper (2004), The Stationery Office, London
27. Owens S. Land. Limits and sustainability: a conceptual framework and some dilemmas for the planning system. Transactions IBG 19 (1994) 439-456
28. Owens S., Rayner T., and Bina O. New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice and research. Environment and Planning A 36 (2004) 1943-1959
29. Painter J. Governmentality and regional economic strategies. In: Hillier J., and Rooksby E. (Eds). Habitus: A Sense of Place (2002), Ashgate, Aldershot 115-139
30. Roberts P., and Lloyd G. Institutional aspects of regional planning, management and development: models and lessons from the English experience. Environment and Planning B: Environment and Design 26 4 (1999) 517-531
31. Rydin Y. Land use planning and environmental capacity: reassessing the use of regulatory policy tools to achieve sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41 6 (1998) 749-765
32. Rydin Y., Homan N., Hads V., and Sommer F. Incorporating sustainable development concerns into an urban regeneration project: how politics can defeat procedures. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46 4 (2003) 545-561
33. Short M., Jones C., Carter J., Baker M., and Wood C. Current practice in environmental assessment of development plans in England. Regional Studies 38 2 (2004) 177-190
34. Smith S.P., and Sheate W.R. Sustainability appraisals of regional planning guidance and regional economic strategies in England: an assessment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44 5 (2001) 735-755
35. Smith S.P., and Sheate W.R. Sustainability appraisal of English regional plans: incorporating the requirements of the EU Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 19 (2001) 263-276
36. Therival R., and Minas P. Ensuring effective sustainability appraisal. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20 2 (2002) 81-91
37. Vigar G., and Healey P. Developing environmentally respectful policy programmes: five key principles. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45 4 (2002) 517-532