A new method for evaluating biological safety of environmental water with algae, daphnia and fish toxicity ranks

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 371, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 383-390

  Wei, Dongbin ^a   Kisuno, Akira ^a   Kameya, Takashi ^a   Urano, Kohei ^a  

^a YOKOHAMA NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aquatic organisms; Bio safety rank; Environmental water; Safety score; Toxicity test

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; EXTRAPOLATION; SCREENING; TOXICITY;

AQUATIC ORGANISMS; BIO-SAFETY RANK; ENVIRONMENTAL WATER; SAFETY SCORES; TOXICITY TESTS;

BIODIVERSITY;

FISH VENOM; RIVER WATER; WATER;

ALGA; BIOACCUMULATION; CRUSTACEAN; FISH; POLLUTION EFFECT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RIVER WATER; SAFETY; TOXICITY TEST;

ALGA; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; BIOSAFETY; DAPHNIA; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FISH; NONHUMAN; ORYZIAS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELENUSTRUM CAPRICORNUTUM; WATER QUALITY; WATER SAMPLING;

ALGAE; ANIMALS; DAPHNIA; LARVA; NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL; ORYZIAS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RIVERS; WATER POLLUTANTS;

ALGAE; DAPHNIA; DAPHNIA MAGNA; ORYZIAS LATIPES;

EID: 33750517499     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.08.038     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adams W.J., and Rowland C.D. Aquatic Toxicology Test Methods. In: Hoffman D.J., Rattner B.A., Burton Jr. G.A., and Cairns Jr. J. (Eds). Handbook of Ecotoxicology. 2nd Edition (2003), Lewis Publishers, New York 19-43
2. Babut M., Corinne B., Marc B., Patrick F., Jeanne G., and Genevieve G. Developing environmental quality standards for various pesticides and priority pollutants for French freshwaters. J Environ Manag 69 (2003) 139-147
3. Blaisé C. Microbiotesting: an expanding field in aquatic toxicology. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 40 (1998) 115-119
4. Chapman P.M., Fairbrother A., and Brown D. A critical evaluation of safety factors for ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 17 (1998) 99-108
5. CEC. Council Directive of 4 May 1976 on pollution caused by certain dangerous substances discharged into the aquatic environment of the community (76/464/EEC). Off J Eur Communities, L 129 (1976) 23-29 [18/05]
6. CEC. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy as amended by Decision 2455/2001/EC (Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC). Off J Eur Communities, L 327 (2000) 1-78 [23/10]
7. CEC. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency and amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC) {on Persistent Organic Pollutants}, COM 2003/664, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels 29/10/2003; [158 pp].
8. Dizer H., Wittekindt E., Fischer B., and Hansen P.-D. The cytotoxic potential of surface water and wastewater effluents as determined by bioluminescence, umu-assay and selected biomarkers. Chemosphere 46 (2002) 225-233
9. Duboudin C., Ciffroy P., and Magaud H. Acute to chronic species sensitivity distribution extrapolation. Environ Toxicol Chem 23 (2004) 1774-1785
10. ECETOC. Environmental hazard assessment of substances. ECETOC Technical Report vol. 51 (1993), European Center for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels 92 pp.
11. EEC. Council Directive 93/67/EEC of 20 July 1993 laying down the principles for assessment of risks to man and the environment of substances notified in accordance with Council Directive 67/548/EEC. Off J Eur Communities, L 227 (1993) 9-18 [20/07]
12. EEC. Environmental risk assessment of new and existing substances. Technical Guidance Document in support of Council Directive 93/67/EEC and Regulation (EC) 1488/94, Part II. Off J Eur Communities, L (1996) 243-504
13. Garay V., Roman G., and Isnard P. Evaluation of PNEC values: extrapolation from microtox, algae, daphnid, and fish data to HC5. Chemosphere 40 (2000) 267-273
14. Geis S.W., Fleming K.L., Korthals E.T., Searle G., Reynolds L., and Karner D.A. Modifications to the algal growth inhibition test for use as a regulatory assay. Environ Toxicol Chem 19 (2000) 36-41
15. Giesy J.P., and Graney R.L. Recent development in and intercomparison of acute and chronic bioassays and bioindicators. Hydrobiologia 188/189 (1989) 21-60
16. Heger W., Jung S.-J., Martin S., and Peter H. Acute and prolonged toxicity to aquatic organisms of new and existing chemicals and pesticides. Chemosphere 31 (1995) 2707-2726
17. HELCOM (Helsinki Commission). Requirements for discharging of waste water from the chemical industry (HELCOM Recommendation 23/11) (2002), Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission, Helsinki, Finland 06/03/2002
18. Hutchinson T.H., Solbe J., and Kloepper-Sams P.J. Analysis of the ECETOC Aquatic Toxicity database III-comparative toxicity of chemical substances to different life stages of aquatic organisms. Chemosphere 36 (1998) 129-142
19. Irmer U., Markard C., Blondzik K., Gottschalk C., Kussatz C., Rechenberg B., et al. Quality targets for concentrations of hazardous substances in surface waters in Germany. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 32 (1995) 233-243
20. Ishii S., Urano K., and Kameya T. General conditions for concentrating trace organic compounds in water with porous polystyrene cartridges. J Jpn Soc Water Environ 23 (2000) 85-92 [in Japanese, with English abstract]
21. Kenaga E.E. Predictability of chronic toxicity from acute toxicity of chemicals in fish and aquatic invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 1 (1982) 347-358
22. Lange R., Hutchinson T.H., Scholz N., and Solbe J. Analysis of the ECETOC Aquatic Toxicity (EAT) database II-comparison of acute to chronic ratios for various aquatic organisms and chemical substances. Chemosphere 36 (1998) 115-127
23. Lewis M.A. Use of freshwater plants for phytotoxicity testing: a review. Environ Pollut 87 (1995) 319-336
24. Mark U., and Solbe J. Analysis of the ECETOC Aquatic Toxicity (EAT) database V-the relevance of Daphnia magna as a representative test species. Chemosphere 36 (1998) 155-166
25. MOE of Japan. Comparison on ecotoxicities among different test species (in Japanese) (2002), Ministry of the Environment of Japan, Tokyo, Japan. http://www.env.go.jp/council/05hoken/y0-02/ref03.pdf http://www.env.go.jp/council/05hoken/y053-02/ref03.pdf, 06/06/2006
26. MOE of Japan. Results of eco-toxicity tests of chemicals (2003), Ministry of the Environment in Japan, Tokyo, Japan. http://www.env.go.jp/chemi/sesaku/02.pdf http://www.env.go.jp/chemi/sesaku/02.pdf, 06/06/2006
27. Pfleeger T., McFarlane J.C., Sherman R., and Volk G. A short-term bioassay for whole plant toxicity. In: Gorsuch J.W., Lower W.R., Wang W., and Lewis M.A. (Eds). Plants for toxicity assessment, Vol. 2 ASTM STP 1115 (1991), American Society of Test and Materials, Philadelphia, USA 355-364
28. Roelofs W., Huijbregts M.A.J., Jager T., and Ad Ragas M.J. Prediction of ecological no effect concentrations for initial risk assessment: combining substance-specific data and database information. Environ Toxicol Chem 22 (2003) 1387-1393
29. Roman G., Isnard P., and Jouany J.M. Critical analysis of methods for assessment of predicted no effect concentration. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 43 (1999) 117-125
30. Thatcher M., Robson M., Henriquez L.R., Karman C.C., and Payne G. A user guide for the evaluation of chemical used and discharged offshore (ver. 1.4), A CIN (Charm Implementation Network) revised CHARM III report 2004 (2005). http://www.ogp.org.uk/pubs/CHARMManualFeb05.pdf The Netherlands, 73 pp. http://www.ogp.org.uk/pubs/CHARMManualFeb05.pdf, 22/09/2006
31. US Environment Protection Agency. Guidelines and support documents for environment effect testing, ES-5: algal acute toxicity test EPA 560/6-82-002 (1982), Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, USEPA, Washington DC 31 pp.
32. US Environmental Protection Agency. Permit writer's guide to water quality-based permitting for toxic pollutants EPA 440/4-87-005 (1987), Office of Water, USEPA, Washington, DC 64 pp.
33. US Environmental Protection Agency. Technical support document for water quality-based control EPA-505/2-90-001 (1991), Office of Water, USEPA, Washington DC 335 pp.
34. US Environment Protection Agency. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms (Fifth Edition) EPA-821-R-02-012 (2002), USEPA, Washington DC 275 pp.
35. Van Straalen N.M., and Denneman C.A.J. Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 18 (1989) 241-251
36. Wagner C., and Lokke H. Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data. Water Res 25 (1991) 1237-1242
37. Walsh G.E., and Garnas R.L. Determination of bioactivity of chemical fractions of liquid wastes using freshwater and saltwater algae and daphnias. Environ Sci Technol 17 (1983) 180-182
38. Walsh G.E., Bahner L.H., and Horning W.B. Toxicity of textile mill effluents to freshwater and estuarine algae, daphnias, and fishes. Environ Pollut 21 (1980) 169-179
39. Walsh G.E., Duke K.M., and Foster R.B. Algae and daphnias as indicators of bioactivity of industrial wastes. Water Res 16 (1982) 879-883
40. Zeliger H.I. Toxic effects of chemical mixtures. Arch Environ Health 58 (2003) 23-29