Idea 2004: Anticipated implications for clinical practice-integrating assessment and intervention

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 871-882

  Holdnack, James A ^a,b   Weiss, Lawrence G ^a  

^a Harcourt Assessment Inc   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750495796     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20194     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Berninger, V.M., Hart, T., Abbott, R., & Karovsky, P. (1992). Defining reading and writing disabilities with and without IQ: A flexible developmental perspective. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 103-118.
2. Conference Report, House Report 108-077. (2003). Improving Education Results for Children with Disabilities Act of 2003.
3. Department of Education. (1977). 34 C.F.R. 300.540-544 Federal Register, December 29, 1977.
4. Department of Education. (2005). 34 CFR Parts 300, 301 and 304 Federal Register June 21, 2005.
5. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-192, 89 Stat. 773 (1975).
6. Equal Educational Opportunity Act of 1974. Title 20, Chapter 39, USC Sec. 1701-1703.
7. Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
8. Kavale, K.A., Holdnack, J.A., & Mostert, M.P. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and the identification of specific learning disability: A critique and alternative proposal. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 2-16.
9. Kollmann, G. (2000). Social Security: Summary of major changes in the cash benefits program. Retrieved from http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/ society/socwelf/ss2000.htm
10. Learning Disability Association of Canada. (2002). LD defined. Retrieved March 29, 2006, from http://www.ldac-taac.ca/Defined/defined new-e.asp
11. Learning Disability Association of Ontario. (2006). LDAO recommended practices for assessment, diagnosis and documentation of learning disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.ldao.ca/resources/education/pei/assessment/index.php
12. Lyon, G.R., & Chhabra, V. (2002). The current state of the science and the future of specific reading disabilities. Denver, CO: Colorado Reading Center. Retrieved March 7, 2006, from http://www.coloradoreading.com/nichad.htm
13. MacMillan, D.L., & Forness, S.R. (1998). The role of IQ in special education placement decisions: Primary and determinative or peripheral and inconsequential? Remedial & Special Education, 19, 239-253.
14. National Reading Panel. (1997). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
15. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instructions (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
16. Pasternak, R.H. (2002, March). The demise of IQ testing for children with learning disabilities. Keynote Address presented at the annual convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago.
17. Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 155-168.
18. Siegel, L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469-478.
19. Social Security Act of 1935, 42 U.S.C. §§301-1397jj.
20. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). The No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Author.
21. Weiss, L.G., Saklofske, D.H., Prifitera, A., & Holdnack, J.A. (2006). WISC-IV Advanced Clinical Interpretation. San Diego: Elsevier Science.