Resource allocation for community-based therapy

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 28, Issue 22, 2006, Pages 1425-1432

  Murchland, Sonya ^a   Wake Dyster, Wendy ^a  

^a Novita Children's Services   (Australia)

Author keywords

Children; Community based service provision; Human resource allocation; Paediatrics; Physical disability; Therapy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH CARE; COMMUNITY BASED REHABILITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPHAGIA; EARLY CHILDHOOD INTERVENTION; FAMILY LIFE; GENERAL CONDITION DETERIORATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE MANPOWER; HEALTH CARE NEED; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALIZATION; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SPECIAL EDUCATION; TEAMWORK; TIME MANAGEMENT; TRAVEL; WELLBEING; WORKLOAD; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

CHILD; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DISABLED CHILDREN; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PERSONNEL STAFFING AND SCHEDULING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 33750480502     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280600638281     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. (2003) Australian Government Department of Family and Community Services, Commonwealth State Territory Disability Agreement (2002-2007). Canberra
2. Braithwaite, J and Hindle, D and Phelan, P and Hanson, R. (1998) Casemix funding in Australia Medical Journal of Australia, 168(11), pp. 558-562.
3. Duckett, S and Gray, L and Howe, A. (1995) Designing a funding system for rehabilitation services. Part 2: Policy objectives and options for achieving efficiency and quality of care Australian Health Review, 18(4), pp. 62-77.
4. Eagar, K. (1999) The Australian National Sub-Acute and Non-Acute Patient casemix classification Australian Health Review, 22(3), pp. 180-196.
5. Bhaskara, S. (1999) Setting benchmarks and determining psychiatric workloads in community mental health programs Psychiatry Services, 50(5), pp. 695-697.
6. Crofts, D and Bowns, I and Williams, T and Rigby, A and Haining, R and Hall, D. (2000) Hitting the target: The equitable distribution of health visitors across caseloads Journal of Public Health Medicine, 22(3), pp. 295-301.
7. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2001) Australia's Welfare 2001. Canberra: AIHW.
8. Dyson, M and Duckett, S and Allen, F. (2000) A therapy relevant case mix classification system for school aged children with disabilities Archives of Physical Medicine, 81(5), pp. 634-643.
9. DePoy, E and Gitlin, L. (2001) Introduction to Research: Multiple Strategies for Health and Human Services. St Louis MO: Mosby.
10. Astley, J and Wake-Dyster, W. (2001) Evidence-based priority setting Australian Health Review, 24(2), pp. 32-39.
11. (2001) World Health Organization Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.