Measuring state TANF policy variations and change after reform

Social Science Quarterly

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 755-781

  De Jong, Gordon F ^a   Graefe, Deborah Roempke ^a   Irving, Shelley K ^a   Pierre, Tanja St ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750460966     PISSN: 00384941     EISSN: 15406237     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00432.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allard, Scott W., and Sheldon Danziger. 2000. "Welfare Magnets: Myth or Reality?" Journal of Politics 62:350-68.
2. Anselin, Luc. 1986. MicroQAP; A Microcomputer Implementation of Generalized Measures of Spatial Association. Working Paper, Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara.
3. Berry, William D., Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 2003. "Reassessing the 'Race to the Bottom' in State Welfare Policy." Journal of Politics 45:327-49.
4. Blank, Rebecca M. 2001. "What Causes Public Assistance Caseloads to Grow?" Journal of Human Resources 36:85-118.
5. Brueckner, Jan K. 2000. "Welfare Reform and the Race to the Bottom: Theory and Evidence." Southern Economic Journal 66:505-25.
6. Buckley, F. H., and Margaret F. Brinig. 1997. "Welfare Magnets: The Race for the Top." Supreme Court Economic Review 5:14-177.
7. Committee for Economic Development. 2000. Welfare Reform and Beyond; Making Work Work. New York: Author.
8. Curtis, Karen A. 1999. "Welfare Reform in Delaware: A Better Chance for Whom?" In Stanford F. Schram and Samuel H. Beer, eds., Welfare Reform: A Race to the Bottom? Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
9. De Jong, Gordon F., Deborah Roempke Graefe, and Tanja St. Pierre. 2005. "Welfare Families and Interstate Migration of Poor Families." Demography 42:69-96.
10. Donahue, John D. 1997. "Tiebout? Or Not Tiebout? The Market Metaphor and America's Devolution Debate." Journal of Economic Perspectives 11:73-81.
11. Fender, Lynne, Signe-Mary McKernan, and Jen Bernstein. 2002. Linking State TANF and Related Policies to Outcomes; Preliminary Typologies and Analysis. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
12. Figlio, David N., Van W. Kolpin, and William Reid. 1999. "Do States Play Welfare Games?" Journal of Urban Economics 46:437-54.
13. Harvard Law Review. 1996. "Devolving Welfare to the States: A Public Choice Perspective" (Notes). Harvard Law Review 109:1984-2001.
14. Hinckley, Katherine A., and Jesse F. Marquette. 1983. "Views Through a Kaleidoscope: The Dimensions of State Policy Welfare Measures." Western Political Quarterly 18: 466-78.
15. Johnson, Jacelyn M., and Kara Lindaman. 1999. "Implementing Welfare Reform in Kansas: Moving, But Not Racing." In Sanford F. Schram and Samuel H. Beer, eds., Welfare Reform: A Race to the Bottom? Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
16. Kaiser, H. F. 1960. "The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis." Educational and Psychological Measurement 20:141-51.
17. Kim, Jae-On, and Charles W. Mueller. 1978. Introduction to Factor Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
18. Lurie, Irene. 1999. "Watching the Race: Where You Sit Affects What You See." In Sanford F. Schram and Samuel H. Beer, eds., Welfare Reform: A Race to the Bottom? Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
19. McKernan, Signe-Mary, Jen Bernstein, and Lynne. Fender. 2004. "Taming die Beast: Categorizing Welfare Policies: A Typology of Welfare Policies Affecting Recipient Job Entry." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24:435-42.
20. Mead, Lawrence M. 1999. "The Decline of Welfare in Wisconsin." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory; J-PART 9:597-622.
21. Meyers, Marcha K., Janet C. Gornick, and Laura R. Peck. 2001. "Packaging Support for Low-Income Families: Policy Variations Across the United States." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20:457-83.
22. Morrison, D. F. 1976. Multivariate Statistical Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
23. Nathan, Richard P., and Thomas L. Gais. 1999. "Early Findings about the Newest New Federalism for Welfare." In Sanford F. Schram and Samuel H. Beer, eds., Welfare Reform: A Race to the Bottom? Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
24. Peck, Jamie. 1998. "Postwelfare Massachusetts." Economic Geography 74:62-82.
25. Peterson, Paul E., and Mark C. Rom. 1990. Welfare Magnets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26. Rowe, Gretchen, and Jeffery Versteeg. 2005. Welfare Rules Databook: State TANF Policies as of July 2005. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
27. Saavedra, Luz A. 2000. "A Model of Welfare Competition with Evidence from the AFDC." Journal of Urban Economics 47:248-79.
28. Schram, Sanford F. 2000. After Welfare: The Culture of Postindustrial Social Policy. New York: New York University Press.
29. Schram, Sanford F., and Samuel H. Beer. 1999. Welfare Reform: A Race to the Bottom? Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
30. Schram, Sanford, Lawrence Nitz, and Gary Krueger. 1998. "Widiout Cause of Effect: Reconsidering Welfare Migration as a Policy Problem." American Journal of Political Science 42:210-30.
31. Soss, Joe, Standford Schram, Thomas Vartanian, and Erin O'Brien. 2001. "Setting the Terms of Relief: Explaining State Policy Choices in the Devolution Revolution." American Journal of Political Science 45:378-95.
32. Urban Institute. 2000. Assessing the New Federalism State Database. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Available at (http://www.urban.org).
33. U.S. General Accounting Office. 2000. Welfare Reform: State Sanction Policies and Number of Families Affected. Technical Report No. GAO/HEHS-00-44. Washington, DC: Author.
34. Volden, Craig. 2002. "The Politics of Competitive Federalism: A Race to the Bottom in Welfare Benefits?" American Journal of Political Science 46:352-63.
35. Weil, Alan. 2000. Program Redesign by States in the Wake of Welfare Reform: Making Sense of the Effects of Devolution. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
36. _. 2002. Ten Things Everyone Should Know about Welfare Reform. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.