Trans‐Atlantic relations after the war in Iraq: Returning to ‐ or departing from ‐ ‘normal politics’?

Perspectives on European Politics and Society

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 395-417

  Flockhart, Trine ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750457219     PISSN: 15705854     EISSN: 15680258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15705850408438896     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. A. Moravscik, ‘Striking a new transatlantic bargain’, Foreign Affairs, 82(4), 2003, p. 74.
2. R. Kanet, ‘The Bush revolution in U.S. foreign policy and the future of U.S. relations with Europe’, Paper presented at the CIIS/ISA Millennium Conference, Salzburg, 7-8 July 2004, p. 4.
3. D. Calleo, Beyond American Hegemomy (New York, Basic Books, 1987), p. 13.
4. G. J. Ikenberry, After Victory (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), p. 170.
5. R. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984), p. 32.
6. T. Flockhart, The Two Faces of Consensus. A Study of Alliance and Domestic Consensus in NATO’s INF Policy, Ph.D. thesis, University of East Anglia, 1991. 12 Kanet, ‘The Bush revolution’, p. 16.
7. H. Gartner, et al., Europe’s New Security Challenges (Boulder CO: Lynne Reinner, 2001), pp. 242-4.
8. T. Dunne, ‘When the shooting starts: Atlanticism in British security strategy’, International Affairs, 80(5), 2004, p. 817.
9. I. Daalder, ‘End of Atlanticism’, Survival, 45(2) 2003, p. 147.
10. J. Rubin, ‘Stumbling into War’, Foreign Affairs, 82(5) 2003, p. 46.
11. G. J. Ikenberry, ‘Liberal hegemony and the future of American post-war order’, in T. V. Paul and J. A. Hall, International Order and the Future of World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 123-45.
12. J. Checkel, ‘Social construction and integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6(4), 1999, pp. 545-60.
13. M. Finnemore and K. Sikkink, ‘International norms dynamics and political change’, International Organization, 52(4), 1998, pp. 887-917.
14. R. W. Cox, ‘Social forces, states and world orders’, Millennium, 10(2), 1981, pp. 126-55.
15. L. Xing, ‘Conceptualising the crisis of socialism: a Gramscian approach’, Aalborg University Development Research Series, Working Paper 62, 1998, p. 12.
16. S. Hobden and R. Wyn Jones, ‘Marxist theories of international relations’. In J. Baylis and S. Smith, The Globalization of World Politics (Oxford: 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 210.
17. A. Johnston, ‘Treating interna-tional institutions as social environments’, International Studies Quarterly, 45, 2001, pp. 487-515.
18. R. Lebow and R. Kelly, ‘Thucydides and hegemony: Athens and the United States’, Review of International Studies, 27(4), 2001, pp. 593-609.
19. G. J. Ikenberrys and C. Kupchan, ‘Socialisation and hegemonic power’, International Organization, 44(3), 1990, pp. 283-315.
20. K. W. Qingxin, ‘Hegemony, socialisation and US-Japanese policy cooperation’, Review of International Studies, 29(1), 2003, pp. 99-120.